Indiana Lawyer Mobile App



FREE for a limited time!

Description

Award winning, legal news covering the state of Indiana. Accessible when you want it, wherever you go! Indiana Lawyer, the premier source for legal news in Indiana, offers this best-in-class application for use on your iPhone, Android or BlackBerry.

Everything you need to know about legal news in Indiana:

• Latest/Breaking News
• Law Firms
• Opinions (Court of Appeals)
• Courts
• Pro bono/Legal aid
• Law schools
• Discipline
• Government
• Feature stories
• Bar Associations
• CLE Calendar
• In-house counsel profiles
• On the Move (legal people and positions)
• Photo Galleries
...and much more!

Sharing features include:

• Forward to a friend via email
• Send story link via text message
• Post content to Twitter/Facebook

Also includes:

• Indiana Lawyer Events
• Weather forecast
• Top news from Indianapolis Business Journal too

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT