Supplements

 

Corporate
                           Counsel Guide
Corporate Counsel Guide
2016/12/14
Leadership in Law 2016
Leadership in Law 2016
2016/05/04
Corporate
                           Counsel Guide
Corporate Counsel Guide
2015/15/12
Leadership in
                           Law
Corporate Counsel Guide
2014/17/12
Corporate
                           Counsel Guide
Corporate Counsel Guide
2014/17/12
2013 LIL
Leadership In Law
2014/23/4
Corporate Counsel Guide
Corporate Counsel Guide
2014/23/2
2013 LIL
Leadership In Law
2013/24/4
CCG 2013
Corporate Counsel Guide
2012/12/5
2011 Book of Lobbyists
Leadership in Law
2012/04/27
2011 Book of Lobbyists
Corporate Counsel Guide
2011/12/21
2011 Book of Lobbyists
Book of Lobbyists
2011/08/03
Leadership In Law
Leadership In Law
2011/04/27
Leadership In Law
Corporate Counsel Guide
2011/04/15
Book of Lobbyists
Book of Lobbyists
2010/08/04
Leadership In
                           Law
Leadership In Law
2010/04/28
Indiana Pro Bono
Indiana Pro Bono Commission
2010/03/17
Corporate Counsel
Corporate Counsel
2009/12/09
Diversity In Practice
Diversity In Practice
2009/10/28
Book of Lobbyists
Book of Lobbyists
2009/08/05
Leadership
                           In Law
Leadership In Law
2009/04/29
Indiana Pro Bono
Indiana Pro Bono Commission
2009/03/18
 
Corporate
                           Counsel
Corporate Counsel
2008/12/10
Corporate Counsel Guide
Corporate Counsel Guide
Corporate Counsel Guide
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. As one of the many consumers affected by this breach, I found my bank data had been lifted and used to buy over $200 of various merchandise in New York. I did a pretty good job of tracing the purchases to stores around a college campus just from the info on my bank statement. Hm. Mr. Hill, I would like my $200 back! It doesn't belong to the state, in my opinion. Give it back to the consumers affected. I had to freeze my credit and take out data protection, order a new debit card and wait until it arrived. I deserve something for my trouble!

  2. Don't we have bigger issues to concern ourselves with?

  3. Anyone who takes the time to study disciplinary and bar admission cases in Indiana ... much of which is, as a matter of course and by intent, off the record, would have a very difficult time drawing lines that did not take into account things which are not supposed to matter, such as affiliations, associations, associates and the like. Justice Hoosier style is a far departure than what issues in most other parts of North America. (More like Central America, in fact.) See, e.g., http://www.theindianalawyer.com/indiana-attorney-illegally-practicing-in-florida-suspended-for-18-months/PARAMS/article/42200 When while the Indiana court system end the cruel practice of killing prophets of due process and those advocating for blind justice?

  4. Wouldn't this call for an investigation of Government corruption? Chief Justice Loretta Rush, wrote that the case warranted the high court’s review because the method the Indiana Court of Appeals used to reach its decision was “a significant departure from the law.” Specifically, David wrote that the appellate panel ruled after reweighing of the evidence, which is NOT permissible at the appellate level. **But yet, they look the other way while an innocent child was taken by a loving mother who did nothing wrong"

  5. Different rules for different folks....

ADVERTISEMENT