Contact Us

Indiana Lawyer

Indiana Lawyer and TheIndianaLawyer.com
published by IBJ Media

Corporate Office
Indiana Lawyer
41 E. Washington St., Suite 200
Indianapolis, IN 46204-3592
TEL: (317) 634-6200

TEL: (800) 968-1225
FAX: (317) 263-5060

Office Hours:
8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday

 

President - IBJ Media

Greg Morris
317-472-5320

Editorial

Editor / Publisher
Kelly Lucas
317-472-5233

Managing & Web Editor
Jennifer Nelson
317-472-5234

Staff Writers
Marilyn Odendahl
317-472-5390

Dave Stafford
317-472-5231

Art

Director of Production
Patricia Keiffner
317-472-5354

Creative Director
Susan Bertocci
317-472-5356

Advertising and Marketing Designer
Rob Espinoza
317-472-5358

Custom Publishing Designer
Traci Powers
317-472-5350

Technical Production Coordinator
Nancy J. Leslie
317-472-5238

Production Coordinator
Jodi Belcher
317-472-5398

Editorial Art

Editorial Art Associates
Julie Kirkendoll
317-472-5394
Brad Turner
317-472-5355
David Vrabel
317-472-5359
 

Advertising

Director of Advertising
Lisa Bradley
317-472-5321

Sales & Marketing Coordinator
Patty Johns
317-472-5319

Circulation

Director of Circulation
Bill Wright
317-472-5342

Circulation Manager
Cheri Wilson
317-472-5344

Circulation Associates
Jacki Smith
317-472-5240

Administration

Chief Financial Officer
Jeff Basch
317-472-5332

Director of Marketing
Kim Howell
317-472-5315

Finance Manager
Sherry Robinson
317-472-5324

Legal Advertising Coordinator
Judy Smith
317-472-5221

Administrative Assistant
Karen Aruta
317-472-5201

Accounts Receivable Coordinator
Jacki Smith
317-472-5302

New Media & Technology

Director
Steve Carder
317-472-5340

IT Administrator
Tim Nagle
317-472-5352

New Media Developers
Chris Schultz
317-472-5325
Michael Krisch
317-472-5346

 

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT