Contact Us

Indiana Lawyer

Indiana Lawyer and TheIndianaLawyer.com
published by IBJ Media

Corporate Office
Indiana Lawyer
41 E. Washington St., Suite 200
Indianapolis, IN 46204-3592
TEL: (317) 634-6200

TEL: (800) 968-1225
FAX: (317) 263-5060

Office Hours:
8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday

 

President - IBJ Media

Greg Morris
317-472-5320

Editorial

Editor / Publisher
Kelly Lucas
317-472-5233

Managing & Web Editor
Jennifer Nelson
317-472-5234

Staff Writers
Marilyn Odendahl
317-472-5390

Dave Stafford
317-472-5231

Art

Director of Production
Patricia Keiffner
317-472-5354

Creative Director
Kristen Hambridge
317-472-5356

Advertising and Marketing Designer
Rob Espinoza
317-472-5358

Custom Publishing Designer
Traci Powers
317-472-5350

Technical Production Coordinator
Nancy J. Leslie
317-472-5238

Production Coordinator
Jodi Belcher
317-472-5398

Editorial Art

Editorial Art Associates
Julie Kirkendoll
317-472-5394
Brad Turner
317-472-5355
 

Advertising

Director of Advertising
Lisa Bradley
317-472-5321

Sales & Marketing Coordinator
Patty Johns
317-472-5319

Circulation

Director of Circulation
Bill Wright
317-472-5342

Circulation Manager
Cheri Wilson
317-472-5344

Circulation Associates
Jacki Smith
317-472-5240

Administration

Chief Financial Officer
Jeff Basch
317-472-5332

Director of Marketing
Kim Howell
317-472-5315

Finance Manager
Sherry Robinson
317-472-5324

Legal Advertising Coordinator
Judy Smith
317-472-5221

Administrative Assistant
Karen Aruta
317-472-5201

Accounts Receivable Coordinator
Jacki Smith
317-472-5302

New Media & Technology

Director
Steve Carder
317-472-5340

IT Administrator
Tim Nagle
317-472-5352

New Media Developers
Chris Schultz
317-472-5325
Michael Krisch
317-472-5346

 

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Today, I want to use this opportunity to tell everyone about Dr agbuza of agbuzaodera(at)gmail. com, on how he help me reunited with my husband after 2 months of divorce.My husband divorce me because he saw another woman in his office and he said to me that he is no longer in love with me anymore and decide to divorce me.I seek help from the Net and i saw good talk about Dr agbuza and i contact him and explain my problem to him and he cast a spell for me which i use to get my husband back within 2 days.am totally happy because there is no reparations and side-effect. If you need his help Email him at agbuzaodera(at)gmail. com

  2. The practitioners and judges who hail E-filing as the Saviour of the West need to contain their respective excitements. E-filing is federal court requires the practitioner to cram his motion practice into pigeonholes created by IT people. Compound motions or those seeking alternative relief are effectively barred, unless the practitioner wants to receive a tart note from some functionary admonishing about the "problem". E-filing is just another method by which courts and judges transfer their burden to practitioners, who are the really the only powerless components of the system. Of COURSE it is easier for the court to require all of its imput to conform to certain formats, but this imposition does NOT improve the quality of the practice of law and does NOT improve the ability of the practitioner to advocate for his client or to fashion pleadings that exactly conform to his client's best interests. And we should be very wary of the disingenuous pablum about the costs. The courts will find a way to stick it to the practitioner. Lake County is a VERY good example of this rapaciousness. Any one who does not believe this is invited to review the various special fees that system imposes upon practitioners- as practitioners- and upon each case ON TOP of the court costs normal in every case manually filed. Jurisprudence according to Aldous Huxley.

  3. Any attorneys who practice in federal court should be able to say the same as I can ... efiling is great. I have been doing it in fed court since it started way back. Pacer has its drawbacks, but the ability to hit an e-docket and pull up anything and everything onscreen is a huge plus for a litigator, eps the sole practitioner, who lacks a filing clerk and the paralegal support of large firms. Were I an Indiana attorney I would welcome this great step forward.

  4. Can we get full disclosure on lobbyist's payments to legislatures such as Mr Buck? AS long as there are idiots that are disrespectful of neighbors and intent on shooting fireworks every night, some kind of regulations are needed.

  5. I am the mother of the child in this case. My silence on the matter was due to the fact that I filed, both in Illinois and Indiana, child support cases. I even filed supporting documentation with the Indiana family law court. Not sure whether this information was provided to the court of appeals or not. Wish the case was done before moving to Indiana, because no matter what, there is NO WAY the state of Illinois would have allowed an appeal on a child support case!

ADVERTISEMENT