ILBlogs
 |
|
Recent Blog Posts
Study for the bar exam by playing a game
Jennifer NelsonMay 25, 2011
Comments(0)Forget boring books to prepare for the bar exam. Play a board game and become a lawyer!
MoreRally planned in response to Barnes ruling
Jennifer NelsonMay 24, 2011
Comments(2)A Facebook group is calling for people to go to the Statehouse Wednesday at noon and “stand up” for their Fourth
Amendment rights following a recent Indiana Supreme Court decision. If you’re going, let us know.
MoreNumber of female judges in Indiana remains stagnant
Jennifer NelsonMay 17, 2011
Comments(0)A national ranking of the number of female judges shows just a fifth of Hoosier judges are women.
MoreDoes Indiana have enough lawyers?
Jennifer NelsonMay 16, 2011
Comments(5)A study by a northeast Indiana school hoping to open a new law school says that Indiana is underserved in terms of the number
of lawyers compared to our population.
MoreCancer and child custody
Jennifer NelsonMay 12, 2011
Comments(0)A North Carolina woman lost her custody battle in part because she has breast cancer.
MoreCollege student preparing for legal career
Jennifer NelsonMay 11, 2011
Comments(0)An Indiana student utilizes small claims court to take on companies.
MoreAttorney leads Facebook page to remove Trump as Indy 500 pace car driver
Jennifer NelsonMay 5, 2011
Comments(0)Could an Indianapolis attorney’s Facebook page seeking to “bump” Donald Trump as the pace car driver in
the Indianapolis 500 have led to Trump’s decision to step down as driver?
MoreSenator doesn't pass the bar
Jennifer NelsonMay 3, 2011
Comments(6)The list of successful bar exam applicants was released this week and it was missing a recognizable name.
More
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.