ILBlogs

First Impressions
Jennifer Mehalik
More First Impressions

Recent Blog Posts

Number of female judges in Indiana remains stagnant

Jennifer Nelson
May 17, 2011
Comments(0)
A national ranking of the number of female judges shows just a fifth of Hoosier judges are women.
More

Does Indiana have enough lawyers?

Jennifer Nelson
May 16, 2011
Comments(5)
A study by a northeast Indiana school hoping to open a new law school says that Indiana is underserved in terms of the number of lawyers compared to our population.
More

Cancer and child custody

Jennifer Nelson
May 12, 2011
Comments(0)
A North Carolina woman lost her custody battle in part because she has breast cancer.
More

College student preparing for legal career

Jennifer Nelson
May 11, 2011
Comments(0)
An Indiana student utilizes small claims court to take on companies.
More

Attorney leads Facebook page to remove Trump as Indy 500 pace car driver

Jennifer Nelson
May 5, 2011
Comments(0)
Could an Indianapolis attorney’s Facebook page seeking to “bump” Donald Trump as the pace car driver in the Indianapolis 500 have led to Trump’s decision to step down as driver?
More

Senator doesn't pass the bar

Jennifer Nelson
May 3, 2011
Comments(6)
The list of successful bar exam applicants was released this week and it was missing a recognizable name.
More

Electronic case filing

Jennifer Nelson
May 2, 2011
Comments(0)
The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals now requires all documents to be filed and served electronically.
More

Organs from death row

Jennifer Nelson
April 25, 2011
Comment(1)
Should a willing death row inmate be allowed to donate his or her organs after execution?
More
Page  << 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >> pager
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. The $320,000 is the amount the school spent in litigating two lawsuits: One to release the report involving John Trimble (as noted in the story above) and one defending the discrimination lawsuit. The story above does not mention the amount spent to defend the discrimination suit, that's why the numbers don't match. Thanks for reading.

  2. $160k? Yesterday the figure was $320k. Which is it Indiana Lawyer. And even more interesting, which well connected law firm got the (I am guessing) $320k, six time was the fired chancellor received. LOL. (From yesterday's story, which I guess we were expected to forget overnight ... "According to records obtained by the Journal & Courier, Purdue spent $161,812, beginning in July 2012, in a state open records lawsuit and $168,312, beginning in April 2013, for defense in a federal lawsuit. Much of those fees were spent battling court orders to release an independent investigation by attorney John Trimble that found Purdue could have handled the forced retirement better")

  3. The numbers are harsh; 66 - 24 in the House, 40 - 10 in the Senate. And it is an idea pushed by the Democrats. Dead end? Ummm not necessarily. Just need to go big rather than go home. Nuclear option. Give it to the federal courts, the federal courts will ram this down our throats. Like that other invented right of the modern age, feticide. Rights too precious to be held up by 2000 years of civilization hang in the balance. Onward!

  4. I'm currently seeing someone who has a charge of child pornography possession, he didn't know he had it because it was attached to a music video file he downloaded when he was 19/20 yrs old and fought it for years until he couldn't handle it and plead guilty of possession. He's been convicted in Illinois and now lives in Indiana. Wouldn't it be better to give them a chance to prove to the community and their families that they pose no threat? He's so young and now because he was being a kid and downloaded music at a younger age, he has to pay for it the rest of his life? It's unfair, he can't live a normal life, and has to live in fear of what people can say and do to him because of something that happened 10 years ago? No one deserves that, and no one deserves to be labeled for one mistake, he got labeled even though there was no intent to obtain and use the said content. It makes me so sad to see someone I love go through this and it makes me holds me back a lot because I don't know how people around me will accept him...second chances should be given to those under the age of 21 at least so they can be given a chance to live a normal life as a productive member of society.

  5. It's just an ill considered remark. The Sup Ct is inherently political, as it is a core part of government, and Marbury V Madison guaranteed that it would become ever more so Supremely thus. So her remark is meaningless and she just should have not made it.... what she could have said is that Congress is a bunch of lazys and cowards who wont do their jobs so the hard work of making laws clear, oftentimes stops with the Sups sorting things out that could have been resolved by more competent legislation. That would have been a more worthwhile remark and maybe would have had some relevance to what voters do, since voters cant affect who gets appointed to the supremely un-democratic art III courts.

ADVERTISEMENT