ILBlogs

First Impressions
Jennifer Mehalik
More First Impressions

Recent Blog Posts

Greening the law

Jennifer Nelson
April 22, 2011
Comments(0)
Today is Earth Day. How environmentally friendly is your office?
More

Student questions diversity at law school

Jennifer Nelson
April 19, 2011
Comments(3)
An IU-Indy law student says banners featuring African-American males in the school’s atrium make students feel unwelcome.
More

Rating judges online

Jennifer Nelson
April 15, 2011
Comments(0)
Website allows people to anonymously evaluate judges and see how judges across the country rate.
More

TV show provides glimpse into case

Jennifer Nelson
April 12, 2011
Comments(0)
After I began to read an Indiana Court of Appeals opinion handed down Tuesday, I realized why it sounded familiar. I watched an episode of a television program that focused on the murder case.
More

Legal aid cuts: attorneys need to step up

Jennifer Nelson
April 6, 2011
Comments(0)
If Congress slashes the budget for Legal Services Corp., should more attorneys step up to the plate and do pro bono work to make up for the cuts?
More

Law school loses luster?

Jennifer Nelson
April 4, 2011
Comments(0)
According to one group, the number of applicants to law school is down more than 10 percent this year as compared to a year ago.
More

What was he thinking? Part III

Jennifer Nelson
March 25, 2011
Comments(2)
Another Indiana government employee finds himself without a job because of the political issues in Wisconsin.
More

Catchy legal advertising

Jennifer Nelson
March 23, 2011
Comments(2)
When it comes to catchy law firms with catchy slogans, this one may have a winning hand.
More
Page  << 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 >> pager
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT