ILBlogs

First Impressions
Jennifer Mehalik
More First Impressions

Recent Blog Posts

Greening the law

Jennifer Nelson
April 22, 2011
Comments(0)
Today is Earth Day. How environmentally friendly is your office?
More

Student questions diversity at law school

Jennifer Nelson
April 19, 2011
Comments(3)
An IU-Indy law student says banners featuring African-American males in the school’s atrium make students feel unwelcome.
More

Rating judges online

Jennifer Nelson
April 15, 2011
Comments(0)
Website allows people to anonymously evaluate judges and see how judges across the country rate.
More

TV show provides glimpse into case

Jennifer Nelson
April 12, 2011
Comments(0)
After I began to read an Indiana Court of Appeals opinion handed down Tuesday, I realized why it sounded familiar. I watched an episode of a television program that focused on the murder case.
More

Legal aid cuts: attorneys need to step up

Jennifer Nelson
April 6, 2011
Comments(0)
If Congress slashes the budget for Legal Services Corp., should more attorneys step up to the plate and do pro bono work to make up for the cuts?
More

Law school loses luster?

Jennifer Nelson
April 4, 2011
Comments(0)
According to one group, the number of applicants to law school is down more than 10 percent this year as compared to a year ago.
More

What was he thinking? Part III

Jennifer Nelson
March 25, 2011
Comments(2)
Another Indiana government employee finds himself without a job because of the political issues in Wisconsin.
More

Catchy legal advertising

Jennifer Nelson
March 23, 2011
Comments(2)
When it comes to catchy law firms with catchy slogans, this one may have a winning hand.
More
Page  << 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 >> pager
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT