ILBlogs

First Impressions
Jennifer Mehalik
More First Impressions

Recent Blog Posts

ABA: Judges, do you really need to post that vacation photo?

Jennifer Nelson
March 1, 2013
Comments(0)
The American Bar Association doesn’t want to stop judges from using social media, but it wants them to think before “friending” someone online or “liking” someone’s Facebook status.
More

You and social media

Jennifer Nelson
February 13, 2013
Comment(1)
How much time do you spend on social media promoting yourself professionally or your company?
More

Indiana Roll of Attorneys site gets makeover

Jennifer Nelson
February 1, 2013
Comments(0)
The Indiana Roll of Attorneys website has moved into the 21st century and I like it.
More

Finding that work/life balance

Jennifer Nelson
January 22, 2013
Comments(0)
In a recent unscientific poll conducted on our website, more than half of respondents said their top legal-related New Year’s resolution is to have a better work/life balance.
More

Overweight women more likely to be found guilty by skinny men, study says

Jennifer Nelson
January 16, 2013
Comments(0)
If you are fat and a woman, hope that you don’t find yourself facing a jury filled with thin males. A recent study by the Department of Psychology at Yale University found that thin males were more likely to find a woman guilty if she was obese than if she was thin.
More

Studying law online

Jennifer Nelson
January 3, 2013
Comments(0)
Schools across the country are offering more law-related classes online, and they aren’t just for enrolled students.
More

Competition calls out poor, rambling writing

Jennifer Nelson
December 19, 2012
Comments(0)
Know someone who could use a crash course in cutting to the chase? Ever read a legal document and thought that paragraphs of text could be reduced? Then perhaps you should nominate examples of unclear and bad language that could cause harm.
More

Electoral College documents in Indianapolis court

Jennifer Nelson
December 7, 2012
Comments(0)
Those of you who paid attention in government classes or have a nose for history may already know the role the U.S. District Courts play with Electoral College Documents. I recently learned that a court in each state is required to house a set of Electoral College documents for safekeeping.
More
Page  << 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >> pager
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Major social engineering imposed by judicial order well in advance of democratic change, has been the story of the whole post ww2 period. Contraception, desegregation, abortion, gay marriage: all rammed down the throats of Americans who didn't vote to change existing laws on any such thing, by the unelected lifetime tenure Supreme court heirarchs. Maybe people came to accept those things once imposed upon them, but, that's accommodation not acceptance; and surely not democracy. So let's quit lying to the kids telling them this is a democracy. Some sort of oligarchy, but no democracy that's for sure, and it never was. A bourgeois republic from day one.

  2. JD Massur, yes, brings to mind a similar stand at a Texas Mission in 1836. Or Vladivostok in 1918. As you seemingly gloat, to the victors go the spoils ... let the looting begin, right?

  3. I always wondered why high fence deer hunting was frowned upon? I guess you need to keep the population steady. If you don't, no one can enjoy hunting! Thanks for the post! Fence

  4. Whether you support "gay marriage" or not is not the issue. The issue is whether the SCOTUS can extract from an unmentionable somewhere the notion that the Constitution forbids government "interference" in the "right" to marry. Just imagine time-traveling to Philadelphia in 1787. Ask James Madison if the document he and his fellows just wrote allowed him- or forbade government to "interfere" with- his "right" to marry George Washington? He would have immediately- and justly- summoned the Sergeant-at-Arms to throw your sorry self out into the street. Far from being a day of liberation, this is a day of capitulation by the Rule of Law to the Rule of What's Happening Now.

  5. With today's ruling, AG Zoeller's arguments in the cases of Obamacare and Same-sex Marriage can be relegated to the ash heap of history. 0-fer

ADVERTISEMENT