IL Print + TheIndianaLawyer.com Premium Subscription

Here's what you get with your IL Print + TheIndianaLawyer.com Premium subscription for one year:
26 bi-weekly issues of Indiana Lawyer Print including the latest news, in-depth reports, focus sections and special sections that interest Indiana's legal community. Written by the award winning staff of Indiana Lawyer.
x
  Annual Print editions of Leadership in Law and Corporate Counsel Guide
x
  Premium Access to TheIndianaLawyer.com including all paid content from Indiana Lawyer Print
x
  Early online access to Wednesday's print edition of Indiana Lawyer
x
  Indiana Lawyer Digital Editions of all current and past print products for anytime access online
x
  Free email subscription to IL Daily (Monday through Friday) that reports the latest breaking Indiana legal news.
x
  Plus all the other content found on TheIndianaLawyer.com like ... Video, photos, advanced search capabilities, People on the Move and Blogs.
x
Subscribe Now
x

Your subscription will renew automatically for 52 weeks at the rate in effect at the time of your renewal unless you notify us to terminate your subscription prior to your expiration date. You will receive an e-mail notification from ibj.com when your subscription is due to expire.

The subscription fee will be billed automatically to your credit card at the beginning of your subscription at the beginning of any renewals.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT