 SCOTUS ruling emboldens lawmakers to expand DNA collectionJune 19, 2013
This time next year, Indiana may join the majority of states that collect DNA samples from people arrested on suspicion of
committing felonies, rather than only from those convicted. Lawmakers who’ve been stymied are encouraged by a Supreme
Court of the United States decision upholding the practice.More.
|
|
Lawsuit seeks impartial decision-maker in license plate disputeJune 19, 2013
The American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana has filed a lawsuit on behalf of the Indiana Youth Group challenging the authority
of the state’s Bureau of Motor Vehicles to issue an order of remand on its administrative law judge’s order to
restore the LGBT youth group’s specialty license plate.More.
Tax Court rejects company’s claim it was a passive investorJune 19, 2013
A mobile telecommunications group was unable to convince the Indiana Tax Court Tuesday that it was entitled to summary judgment
on the issue of whether it should have received a refund for paid adjusted gross income tax.More.
Court upholds public intoxication convictionJune 19, 2013
A man who refused to leave the side of a friend’s mother after she was hit while crossing the street in Indianapolis
had his conviction of Class B misdemeanor public intoxication upheld by the Indiana Court of Appeals Wednesday. The court
found sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction.More.
|
|
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Back to Top
No irony here, John. Conour’s clients are wise to him. Evidently you’ve missed discovery that disclosed Conour was aware he was caught with his hand in the cookie jar, actually many cookie jars, but continued to spend any monies he secured on himself and his lifestyle. Your theory is idealistic and assumes Conour has the soul of a good attorney and therefore he would take care of his clients. Conour has no soul. He greedily took awarded settlements from his disabled clients and spent it on his own edacious desires. You are naïve to think if he kept working he would put his fees into a restitution fund. He is who he is and has proven he will use any means to cheat and manipulate those who trust him and the judicial system that is supposed to protect them. Sorry John, you don’t send the fox back into the hen house after he’s caught devouring the hens. Conour can’t be trusted. He has no more honor than that fox.
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution