AI use by pro se litigants presents challenges for courts
AI’s presence in court filings seems to only be gaining traction. According to data from legal analyst Damien Charlotin, parties are increasingly using the technology to bolster their cases.
To refine your search through our archives use our Advanced Search
AI’s presence in court filings seems to only be gaining traction. According to data from legal analyst Damien Charlotin, parties are increasingly using the technology to bolster their cases.
Attorneys still should exercise caution when advising a client to do so, even if there are more methods than ever to modify irrevocable trusts.
These sites provide ideal locations for urban infill projects as well as existing improvements and infrastructure for rural developments that can often be acquired at a substantially discounted price.
In 2024, about 82% of McKinney’s graduates stayed in the state, compared with 33% from Maurer in Bloomington and 9% from the University of Notre Dame Law School in South Bend.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Krista B. Gue v. Triple E Property Management, LLC, and M.C. Berber, LLC
No. 25A-CT-832
Civil. Appeal from the Marion Superior Court, Judge James A. Joven. Affirms in part, reverses in part and remands. Holds the trial court properly denied Triple E Property Management’s motion for summary judgment on the tenant’s claim of negligent hiring, retention and supervision, concluding genuine issues of material fact exist regarding the adequacy of the company’s background screening and whether it had reason to know of the need to control its employee. Further holds the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Triple E on the tenant’s respondeat superior claims for invasion of privacy and intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress, determining reasonable jurors could find the employee’s conduct — rummaging through the tenant’s bedroom and sniffing her underwear while present to perform plumbing repairs — arose from activities closely associated with his authorized work and therefore fell within the scope of employment. Concludes, however, that landlord M.C. Berber, LLC is not vicariously liable under the non-delegable duty doctrine, because the employee’s conduct did not breach the landlord’s statutory duty to maintain plumbing in safe working order and did not violate the lease’s covenant of quiet enjoyment, where there was no unlawful entry or interference with the tenant’s possessory interest. Appellant’s attorney: Neal F. Eggeson Jr. Appellees’ attorneys: Jynell D. Berkshire; Tammy J. Meyer; Kenneth A. Ewing.
This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.
Gov. Mike Braun has issued more than 80 executive orders since taking office in January of last year.
Beyond interest rates, the probe is laced with major political — and potentially economic — implications.
Advocates say hundreds of adoptees are already seeking investigations, including many from the United States, who were underrepresented in a previous inquiry even though American parents were by far the biggest recipients of Korean children over the past seven decades.
The measure bans camping, sleeping or long-term sheltering on land owned by the state or a unit of local government — and establishes a Class C misdemeanor for violations.
Friday is set to be the final day of the 2026 Indiana legislative session as lawmakers scramble to work out the final details on a number of bills.
Another national news report has named Indiana as a possible site for a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility — this time, in the state capital.
Anthropic is the last of its peers to not supply its technology to a new U.S. military internal network.
The legislation would require school districts and charter schools across Indiana to adopt policies largely prohibiting student cellphone use from the start of the school day until dismissal.
A lawsuit from Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita alleges the district unlawfully impeded federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Dozens of bills received final concurrence votes in both chambers Wednesday at the Indiana Statehouse.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security officials have defended the data-sharing agreement as necessary to crack down on illegal immigration.
The bill — known as the Indiana Fairness Act — had been awaiting a concurrence vote by the Senate since last week, when author Sen. Liz Brown signed off on its House changes and sent it back to her chamber.
The company alleges the employees converted confidential business records, such as client information, for personal use and transmitted client information to their new employer.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Isaiah Jerone Stokes v. State of Indiana
No. 25A-CR-531
Criminal. Appeal from the Marion Superior Court, Judges Marie Kern and James K. Snyder. Affirms Stokes’ conviction of Level 4 felony unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon. Holds the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the handgun discovered during an inventory search of Stokes’ vehicle following his arrest on outstanding warrants at a gas station. Concludes the decision to impound the vehicle was authorized under Indianapolis-Marion County ordinances because Stokes could not move the vehicle due to his arrest and was also reasonable under the police’s community caretaking function, where the vehicle was parked at a busy gas pump during rush hour and the clerk wanted it removed. Further holds the inventory search was not pretextual, finding officers largely complied with IMPD’s tow policy and that minor deviations — including ultimately releasing the vehicle at the scene rather than completing the tow — did not render the search unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment or Article 1, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution. Notes Judge Pyle dissented, concluding the inventory exception did not apply because the vehicle was never actually impounded. Appellant’s attorneys: Talisha Griffin; Jan B. Berg. Appellee’s attorney: Office of the Indiana Attorney General.
This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.
Since 2023, Eli Lilly and Co. has filed lawsuits against dozens of compound pharmacies, weight-loss centers and health spas that produced and sold copies of Mounjaro and Zepbound.