Search Results

Frustrated with the parties involved in the litigation, the Indiana Court of Appeals April 17 reversed a trial court’s ruling in a case involving public-access laws, fraud, and an insurer’s duty to defend.In Allianz Insurance Company, et al. v. Guidant Corporation, et al., No. 49A05-0704-CV-216, Chief Judge John Baker wrote the unanimous opinion regarding the “monstrosity of a litigation that has crossed state lines” is a straightforward dispute about when and whether an insurer’s duty to defend had been triggered. The judge cited the…

The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a magistrate judge’s ruling in favor of a Michigan company on claims that it was negligent in managing an Indiana trust that eventually collapsed. Magistrate Judge John Paul Godich, of the U.S. District Court Southern District of Indiana’s Indianapolis Division, granted summary judgment in favor of Benefit Actuaries on Indiana Funeral Directors Insurance Trust’s claims that Benefit violated its fiduciary duty under ERISA, and negligently failed to provide competent advice while managing the trust.The…

The Indiana Supreme Court granted transfer Thursday in a case involving the liability of a township trustee for sexual misconduct of her employee. In Debra A. Barnett v. Camille Clark, Trustee of Pleasant Township, No. 76A03-0704-CV-182, the Indiana Court of Appeals overturned the trial court grant of summary judgment in favor of Camille Clark, who is also referred to as Camelia in the brief.Clark’s husband, Donald, was the deputy township trustee. Debra Barnett went to the trustee’s office and met with Donald…

The Indiana Court of Appeals upheld a defendant’s drug convictions, but found the trial court erred in sentencing him. As a result, the appellate court reduced his sentence by 33 years. In Gary L. Williams Jr. v. State of Indiana, No. 39A04-0708-CR-481, Williams appealed his convictions of and his 73-year sentence for dealing in cocaine, and possession of cocaine and marijuana. The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed Williams’ convictions on two counts of dealing in cocaine as Class A felonies, possession of…

The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed a trial court’s denial of a biological mother’s motion to set aside an adoption decree because the court lacked personal jurisdiction over her and her due process rights were violated. In In the matter of the adoption of D.C.; H.R. v. R.C., No. 22A01-0709-CV-425, the appellate court ruled the adoptive mother, R.C., did not do everything she could to contact H.R., the biological mother, about R.C.’s petition to adopt D.C. R.C., who married D.C.’s biological father,…