To refine your search through our archives use our Advanced Search
Today is the final day of the extended window for Diversity in Law 2023 nominations.
Nominations must be submitted online by 11:59 p.m. Email or mail-in nominations will not be considered.
Indiana dentists and hygienists have for a decade paid a $20 compliance fee every other year as part of license renewals. But that changes this year, after a long-simmering dispute between dentists and state regulators boiled over.
The Supreme Court would have to abide by stronger ethics standards under legislation approved on Thursday by the Senate Judiciary Committee, a response to recent revelations about donor-funded trips by justices.
A man has been found dead after a sheriff’s deputy in southwestern Indiana fired his rifle at a tent where officers had heard a gunshot.
Indiana authorities have recovered two complete human DNA profiles from bones and bone fragments found on property once owned by a long-deceased businessman suspected in a string of killings in the 1980s and 1990s.
The Indiana Supreme Court has amended the Rules of Trial Procedure to simplify eligibility for special judge selection in circuit, superior and probate courts.
Court of Appeals of Indiana
Bryan Priest v. State of Indiana
22A-MI-2845
Miscellaneous. Affirms judgment by the Hendricks Superior Court finding Bryan Priest guilty of operating a commercial vehicle with an alcohol concentration equivalent of 0.04 but less than 0.08. Finds evidence admitted at Priest’s bench trial did not constitute hearsay and complied with the Indiana Administrative Code.
A database readout that was admitted in lieu of a missing breath-test ticket was not hearsay, nor was it a violation of the Indiana Administrative Code, the Court of Appeals of Indiana has ruled in a decision that drew a word of “caution” from the panel.
Indianapolis has joined other cities in suing Kia and Hyundai, accusing the automakers of cutting costs by forgoing security features, which has led to an increase in thefts.
A debt purchasing company was not substituted as the party of record or determined to be the plaintiff that owned a default judgment of $1,010 against an Ohio resident, the Court of Appeals of Indiana ruled Thursday in dismissing the appeal.
Gov. Eric Holcomb has announced new judicial appointments for courts in Marion, Allen and Delaware counties.
A man charged with killing two teenage girls from Delphi will remain held at a northern Indiana prison after a judge concluded Wednesday that he’s being treated better there than other inmates.
The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to vote Thursday on a new ethics code for the Supreme Court.
Former Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review his conviction for second-degree murder in the killing of George Floyd, now that the Minnesota Supreme Court has declined to hear the case, his attorney said Wednesday.
The Biden administration argued Wednesday that its new asylum rule is different from versions put forward under President Donald Trump in a court hearing before a judge who threw out Trump’s attempts to limit asylum on the U.S.-Mexico border.
Check out this year’s class of Indiana 250 honorees.
IBJ Media on Thursday released its second annual Indiana 250, a list of the state’s most influential and impactful business and community leaders.
The Court of Appeals of Indiana will hear oral arguments this week and next in cases involving a company seeking a determination of rights under policies sold by various insurers and a dispute over blasting procedure at a quarry that went wrong.
Indiana Supreme Court
Hoosier Contractors, LLC v. Sean Gardner
22S-CT-381
Civil tort. Reverses the denial of Hoosier Contractors LLC’s motion for summary judgment but affirms the denial of Sean Gardner’s motion for partial summary judgment. Finds Gardner did not prove he sustained any injury that would afford him standing to pursue his counterclaim against Hoosier Contractors. Remands with instructions to dismiss the counterclaim for lack of standing. Justice Christopher Goff concurs in the judgment with separate opinion, joined by Chief Justice Loretta Rush.
A man who objected to “literally anything” stemming from a warrantless search of his home didn’t argue the evidence presented at trial conflicted with evidence presented at a suppression hearing, so the trial court didn’t need to revisit the issue.