To refine your search through our archives use our Advanced Search
President Donald Trump has acted swiftly and made significant changes at all levels of the federal government—with many affecting employers.
Third-party discovery rules at the state and federal level are similar but have significant differences.
Talented lawyers are adapting to the changing economy and are increasingly looking around corners, seeking a firm that will help them better serve their current clients.
The legal community has lost a fierce advocate, a trusted colleague and a devoted friend with the passing of Jessie Cook.
Less than two percent of cases go to trial, so trial experiences are hard to come by.
A look at how to address disputes arising at the intersection of smart contracts, blockchains and cryptocurrencies.
We are proceeding with the Rule of Law Initiative discussed in the President’s Message on Feb. 14, 2025.
Preparing to deliver an effective argument is a lot of work. And the entire exercise can be stressful.
The Public Advocacy Committee, made up of lawyer-lobbyists, reviewed every bill and resolution, tagging relevant bills to specific practice groups’ tracking lists.
The mere ownership of a property or business is not enough to establish liability under Indiana’s Environmental Legal Action Statute.
The parent of a child who suffered an asthma attack at school is suing the Metropolitan School District of Lawrence Township and the school after school employees allegedly failed to provide medical help to the child during the incident.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Shawn Laver Perry v. State of Indiana
24A-CR-1624
Criminal. Affirms Shawn Perry’s conviction in Lake Superior Court for criminal confinement. Finds sufficient independent evidence supported Perry’s conviction for criminal confinement. Also finds that because of the trial court’s clear intent to vacate Counts 2 and 5, the case should be remanded with instructions to correct the abstract of judgment. Remands to trial court with instructions the abstract should reflect Perry’s standing convictions for criminal confinement, intimidation and domestic battery. Attorney for appellant: Sean Mullins. Attorneys for appellee: Attorney General Todd Rokita, Deputy Attorney General Justin Roebel.
The Indiana Court of Appeals will be traveling to South Adams High School on Thursday to hear oral arguments in a case involving a fatal car accident.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday blocked an order for the Trump administration to return to work thousands of federal employees who were let go in mass firings aimed at dramatically downsizing the federal government.
Criticisms continued to mount Monday even after a sweeping committee amendment rolled back significant portions of a bill that seeks to limit diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in schools and state government.
Twenty-eight lines instructing embattled Indiana Secretary of State Diego Morales to analyze vote center and municipal election year changes ensnarled the Senate for almost 40 minutes Monday — but, after a 35-13 vote, the bill heads to the Gov. Mike Braun’s desk.
The landmark $2.8 billion settlement that will reach into every corner of college athletics in the months ahead had its final hearing Monday, at which athletes said the sprawling plan was confusing and undervalued them, while attorneys said they were concerned about the impacts on campuses across the country.
Migrants who were temporarily allowed to live in the United States by using a Biden-era online appointment app have been told to leave the country “immediately,” officials said Monday. It was unclear how many beneficiaries would be affected.
Dozens gathered Friday for the Indiana Court of Appeals’ Judge Stephen Scheele’s robing ceremony in the Indiana Supreme Court Courtroom.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Facundo Ramos-Osario v. State of Indiana
24A-CR-1761
Criminal. Reverses the Marion Superior Court’s conviction of Facundo Ramos-Osario for operating a vehicle with an A.C.E. of .08 or more, a Class C misdemeanor. Finds that the totality of the circumstances does not establish that there was a reasonable, particularized suspicion to stop Ramos-Osario’s truck. Also finds the trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence of the stop and anything that flowed from it. Attorney for appellant: Alexander Budzenski. Attorneys for appellee: Attorney General Todd Rokita, Supervising Deputy Attorney General Ian McLean.