Indiana Court of Appeals
Jerry French v. Rebecca (French) Lambert (NFP)
18A05-1403-DR-94
Domestic relation. Affirms in part and reverses in part. The trial court abused its discretion in failing to include all of the unsecured debt of the parties in the marital estate. The trial court was within its discretion to divide the parties’ marital assets equally, but the court failed to include in its findings its determination as to sanctions and attorney fees. Remands for further proceedings.
In the Matter of the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of: A.S. and B.S. (Minor Children) and D.J. (Mother) and H.S. (Father) v. The Indiana Department of Child Services (NFP)
85A02-1403-JT-209
Juvenile. Affirms termination of mother and father’s parental rights.
Corey Weaver v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1402-CR-112
Criminal. Affirms convictions of two counts of Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement.
Carl Gleason v. State of Indiana (NFP)
69A05-1403-CR-141
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class B felony sexual misconduct with a minor and Class C felony sexual misconduct with a minor. Also affirms 80-year sentence for two counts of Class A felony child molesting, the sexual misconduct with a minor convictions, and Class C felony various sexual gratification.
In the Matter of the Paternity of S.P., Minor Child, K.M., Father v. A.P., Mother, and State of Indiana (NFP)
45A04-1312-JP-587
Juvenile. Affirms denial of motion to set aside default judgment against K.M.
Kelly Robertson v. Elkhart Housing Authority (NFP)
20A04-1406-PL-252
Civil plenary. Affirms Elkhart Housing Authority’s motion for summary judgment on Robertson’s lawsuit that it discharged her from employment in violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act.
T.D., and Ti. D. alleged to be CHINS and T.D. (father) v. Dearborn Co. Dept. of Child Services (NFP)
15A05-1403-JC-116
Juvenile. Affirms finding children are children in need of services.
In Re the Paternity of B.M.: J.M. v. M.S. (NFP)
79A05-1403-JP-115
Juvenile. Affirms in part and reverses in part. Father has established, prima facie, that the calculation of child support arrearage includes a mathematical error and that the child support worksheet supporting the prospective child support award does not accurately reflect which parent pays medical insurance. Father has further shown, prima facie, that the trial court abused its discretion by finding him in contempt of court and ordering his payment of mother’s attorney’s fees. Remands with instructions.