Chief justice remembers Scalia’s ‘irrepressible spirit’

  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts is remembering the late Justice Antonin Scalia as a colleague of “irrepressible spirit.”

Roberts said Monday Scalia was “our man for all seasons and we will miss him beyond measure.”

His comments came as the justices took the bench for the first time since the Feb. 13 death of the longtime jurist.

The high court is resuming work just two days after the justices and thousands of dignitaries, friends and family mourned Scalia at a funeral Mass in Washington.

Scalia’s chair was draped in black wool crepe. It will remain in its usual place to the right of Roberts until next month.

Speculation swirls over a potential successor. President Barack Obama has vowed to nominate a candidate succeed Scalia, but Senate Republicans, backed by their party’s presidential contenders, have pledged to block anyone Obama puts forward. Republicans have said the choice should await the next president.

Scalia died in Texas on Feb. 13. He was buried Saturday.

Justice Clarence Thomas said last week that “it is hard to imagine the court” without Scalia, who served as a justice for nearly 30 years.

Scalia’s sharp questioning of lawyers transformed arguments into lively sessions in which the justices sometimes seemed to be talking to each other, rather than to the lawyers arguing before them.

Only in late March do the justices plan to switch seats in line with their seniority on the court. Justice Anthony Kennedy is now the longest-serving member of the court, with 28 years of experience.

Arguments in two cases are scheduled today. One involves a dispute over preferences given to military veterans seeking Veterans Administration contracts. The other case concerns whether evidence of a crime should be thrown out of court because the police did something wrong or illegal that led to the discovery of the evidence.

One of the term's biggest cases, a challenge to Texas’ strict regulation of abortion clinics, awaits the court next week.

 

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}