Opinions Feb. 1, 2018

Keywords Opinions
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

The following 7th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion was posted after IL deadline Wednesday:
Gerardo Correa-Diaz v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III

16-3198
Petition for Review of a Final Administrative Removal Order of the Department of Homeland Security.
Denies Gerardo Correa-Diaz’s petition for review of the Department of Homeland Security’s final administrative removal order against him after he was convicted of of attempted sexual misconduct with a minor. Finds the Board of Immigration Appeals’ definition of sexual abuse of a minor requires deference under Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Nat. Res. Dec. Council, Inc. Also finds Correa-Diaz’s conviction under Indiana Code section 35-42-4-9(a) meets the board’s definition.

Thursday's opinions
Indiana Court of Appeals
Adam Boots v. D. Young Chevrolet, LLC d/b/a Penske Chevrolet, and Capital One Auto Finance, Inc.

29A04-1708-PL-1948
Civil plenary. Reverses the grant of summary judgment in favor of Penske Chevrolet and Capital One Auto Finance, Inc., and enters summary judgment in favor of Adam Boots as a matter of law. Finds the Hamilton Superior Court erred by granting summary judgment to Penske and Capital One. Remands for further proceedings.

In the Matter of the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of: L.G., a Child, and M.S. (Mother) v. Department of Child Services (mem. dec.)
79A02-1709-JT-2152
Juvenile termination of parental rights. Affirms the involuntary termination of M.S.’s parental rights to her minor child, L.G. Finds the Department of Child Services presented clear and convincing evidence to support the Tippecanoe Superior Court’s termination of M.S.’s parental rights.

S.C. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
02A03-1708-JV-1971
Juvenile. Affirms S.C.’s commitment to the Department of Correction. Finds the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}