Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
A Carmel-based attorney has been indefinitely suspended from the practice of law after the Indiana Supreme Court determined he failed to cooperate with the state’s disciplinary process.
According to the state disciplinary commission, more than 90 days have passed since attorney Ronald A. Wright was suspended from practice. This means that his suspension has now been moved to indefinite, in accordance with Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10.1)(c)(4).
Wright was suspended from the practice in August 2025 for failing to submit written responses to pending allegations of professional misconduct against him.
No public documents provided any further details about the allegations against him.
The Indiana Lawyer reached out to Wright and his firm, Wright & Associates, PC, for comment, but did not immediately hear back over the phone or through email.
According to the Indiana Roll of Attorneys, Wright has had two other disciplinary cases filed against him since 2023. A separate disciplinary case filed in December 2023 cited a failure to cooperate with the disciplinary commission’s investigation into a grievance as grounds for suspension. Court documents state that Wright had failed to submit written statements responding to pending allegations of professional misconduct against him.
In January 2024, the commission dismissed the case as moot because Wright had cooperated with the investigation.
On Jan. 12, 2026, the disciplinary commission petitioned the state supreme court to issue an Order to Show Cause directing Wright to show cause as to why he shouldn’t be suspended from the practice for failing to cooperate with a separate investigation. However, the court dismissed the case as moot because Wright was indefinitely suspended on Jan. 15.
If Wright seeks reinstatement into the practice, the issues raised in this current case must be addressed in the court’s reinstatement process under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(18).
The case is In the Matter of: Ronald A. Wright, 25S-DI-150.
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.