The following Indiana Tax Court opinion was posted after IL deadline Monday:
Southlake Indiana, LLC v. Lake County Assessor
Tax. Reverts the assessment of Southlake Indiana LLC’s real property for the 2015 and 2016 tax years to the assessment that was in place for tax year 2010. Finds that neither the Lake County assessor nor Southlake met their requisite burdens of proof under Indiana Code § 6-1.1-15-17.2 regarding the tax assessment of the Southlake Mall.
Indiana Court of Appeals
In re the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of: AJ.D., J.A., and A.D. (Minor Children), and A.A. (Mother) v. Indiana Department of Child Services (mem. dec.)
Juvenile termination of parental rights. Affirms the termination of mother A.A.’s parental rights to her children, J.D., J.A. and A.D. Finds ample evidence to support the findings and conclusion that there is a reasonable probability that the reasons for the children’s removal from A.A. and continued placement outside her home will not be remedied. Also finds the Madison Circuit Court did not clearly err in terminating A.A.’s parental rights.
In re the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of: A.P., Jr., and K.P. (Minor Children), and L.T. (Mother) v. Indiana Department of Child Services (mem. dec.)
Juvenile termination of parental rights. Affirms the involuntary termination of mother L.T.’s parental rights to her children, A.P. Jr. and K.P. Finds the Lake Superior Court’s findings support its conclusions that the conditions under which the children were removed from L.T.’s care would not be remedied, that termination of L.T.’s parental rights was in the children’s best interests and that the Department of Child Services had a satisfactory plan for the children’s care following the termination.
Bioconvergence LLC d/b/a Singota Solutions v. Wendy Carroll and Robert Chris Carroll (mem. dec.)
Civil plenary. Affirms the denial of Bioconvergence LLC d/b/a Singota Solutions’ request for a preliminary injunction against former employee Wendy Carroll and her husband, Chris. Finds the Monroe Circuit Court did not abuse its discretion.