Opinions July 3, 2025

  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Indiana Court of Appeals
Tim Kinder v. Elena Kinder
24A-DN-1079
Domestic relations without children. Reverses Monroe Circuit Court Judge Emily Salzmann’s dissolution order for the marriage of Tim and Elena Kinder. Finds that while the trial court acted within its broad discretion by determining the division of some assets individually, it entered an internally inconsistent order and committed several mathematical errors in its division of the marital estate. Remands for recalculation of the division of the estate in a manner not inconsistent with this opinion. Attorney for appellant: Kendra Gjerdingen. Attorney for appellee: Glen Koch II.

Anthony Tyrone Stone v. State of Indiana
24A-CR-2602
Criminal. Affirms Anthony Stone’s conviction in Vanderburgh Superior Court for attempted aggravated battery and one of his criminal recklessness convictions. Vacates three of Stone’s criminal recklessness convictions on double jeopardy grounds. Remands to the trial court with instructions to vacate three of the criminal recklessness convictions and to resentence Stone accordingly. Attorney for appellant: Yvette LaPlante. Attorneys for appellee: Attorney General Todd Rokita, Supervising Deputy Attorney General Justin Roebel.

Hamilton National Title LLC v. Linda Rothrock Jurus
24A-PL-2872
Civil plenary. Affirms Elkhart Superior Court Judge Teresa Cataldo’s denial of Hamilton National Title’s motion to dismiss and granting of Linda Jurus’ motion for summary judgment on her complaint for breach of contract against Hamilton. Finds the trial court did not err when it denied Hamilton’s motion to dismiss. Also finds the court did not err when it entered summary judgment in favor of Jurus because the designated evidence demonstrated that a written contract existed between Jurus and Hamilton, that Hamilton breached the contract, and that Jurus was harmed by that breach. And the court did not abuse its discretion when it awarded Jurus prejudgment interest. Attorneys for appellant: Scott Fandre, David Johnson. Attorneys for appellee: John Davis, Jr.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}