Supreme Court sends dispute over Fosamax back to lower court

  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

The Supreme Court is sending a dispute between drugmaker Merck and patients who used its bone-strengthening drug Fosamax back to a lower court.

The high court ruled Monday that a lawsuit involving hundreds of people who sued alleging they were injured by Fosamax should go back to a lower court for further proceedings.

The Fosamax users had argued that Merck had failed to provide adequate warnings on the drug’s label. A trial court initially threw out claims against the New Jersey-based company but an appeals court revived them.

Merck had argued that it couldn’t have added a warning risk of an unusual type of thigh-bone fracture earlier than 2010 because the FDA determined the available evidence didn’t support a change before then.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}