Seth Wilson: Build a strong practice for finding emails, cleaning inbox

Keywords Opinion / Viewpoint
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

I recently was going through my personal Gmail account, and the experience reminded me how quickly an unmanaged inbox can become overwhelming.

At work, I try hard to keep my inbox at zero every day. For my personal email, however, the backlog had grown large enough that I wasn’t sure where to start.

Like many administrative problems, this usually surfaces when I am already busy elsewhere and need one specific item, such as a medical bill, that I cannot quickly find. That moment turns a small task into a larger source of friction and creates pressure to fix the entire system immediately.

If this sounds familiar, the goal is not to solve the entire backlog at once but to step back, define the problem and build a manageable process that can last. In this example, I use Microsoft Outlook, because many legal professionals rely on it. But Gmail and other services offer similar functionality.

Scope the problem

Start by testing your assumptions against actual data. My instinct is often to make a problem feel bigger than it is, so I want to understand how many emails I am really handling over a defined period. Outlook’s advanced search can do this, and Copilot in Outlook can also help identify the scope of the issue. For example, you might ask, “How many emails did I receive last week?” and repeat the same exercise for sent emails. That information can help you decide whether you need several short email blocks each day, a single weekly processing session or another schedule that matches the actual volume.

Process the past

Use tools carefully to create momentum, not another reason to delay the work. I am not yet ready to let an AI tool decide everything I need to do, but Copilot can help triage an inbox and bring to the surface messages that may need attention first. If Outlook prompts you to try that feature, it may be worth testing as a way to start moving through the backlog.

A temporary folder-and-rule approach can also help you regain control while you catch up. The point is not to avoid review but to move older messages into an organized place so the active inbox becomes manageable again.

For example, create a folder for a prior year, such as “2025,” and then create a rule that moves messages received before a chosen date into that folder. You can then review that folder separately during scheduled processing time, while your inbox reflects the current items that need active attention.

To process older email, use Copilot or search tools to surface items that may still require action, filing or follow-up. In a legal practice, some older messages might no longer require action but may still need to be saved to the appropriate client matter. That can be handled in short, recurring review sessions until the backlog is resolved.

Prepare for the future

A sustainable email system should be clear enough that someone else could find important information if needed. In a law firm setting, matter-related emails should generally be saved with the matter so they can be located and referenced later. A subfolder or matter-based filing system is usually preferable to treating the inbox itself as the filing system. Most practice management platforms now include an Outlook plug-in or integration that can help save emails to the right place automatically. Choose a structure you can maintain, then build consistent inbox-processing habits around it.

Connect inbox management to firm risk

In a law firm, your email inbox is not just a personal workspace. Someone else may need to locate information quickly, so the system should be consistent enough that another team member can find a matter-related message without relying on your memory or folder habits. Search is useful, but it works best when the underlying filing system is organized and predictable.

That consistency also matters for preservation and production. Some emails may need to be retained, located or produced later, and a firmwide approach makes that work more efficient and more accurate than a collection of custom folder structures.

Retention creates a related risk. If a matter’s retention period has expired but related emails remain scattered in individual inboxes, the firm may keep information longer than necessary, which can increase exposure in the event of a data incident or future search obligation.

The practical takeaway is simple: Organized email is not only a personal productivity habit but also part of client service, continuity, retention and risk management.•

__________

Wilson is an attorney with Adler Attorneys in Noblesville. In addition to practicing law, he helps manage the day-to-day technology operations of the firm. He writes about legal technology at sethrwilson.com and is a frequent speaker on the subject.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Subscribe Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Subscribe Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Upgrade Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Upgrade Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer!

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In