WSJ says Trump libel suit must be tossed ‘once and for all’

The Wall Street Journal asked a judge to dismiss President Donald Trump’s revised $10 billion defamation lawsuit over an article on his ties to the late Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that the new complaint isn’t an improvement on the original version that was tossed out.

Trump’s revised lawsuit still fails to explain how the article — about a “bawdy” birthday note he allegedly sent to the sex offender decades ago — is defamatory, the Journal said in the filing Wednesday in Miami federal court.

Trump “has now had every opportunity to plead a defamation claim,” lawyers for the newspaper said. “His case remains groundless. This action should be dismissed once and for all.”

The news outlet, parent company News Corp. and Chairman Emeritus Rupert Murdoch — all defendants in the suit — asked the judge to dismiss the case “with prejudice” so Trump can’t file it again. They also want Trump to pay their legal fees.

The case is one of several Trump has brought against the media in recent years, including multibillion-dollar defamation claims against the New York Times and the British Broadcasting Corp. The cases have led to widespread claims that Trump is using his power to try to silence media criticism.

“President Trump has filed a powerhouse lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and all of the other defendants,” a spokesman for his legal team said in a statement. “The president will continue to hold those who mislead the American people with fake news and smears accountable for their actions.”

The Journal has stood by the story. The note at the center of the case was compiled with other letters to Epstein into a “birthday book” for his 50th birthday. The book, including Trump’s note, was later handed over by Epstein’s estate in response to a congressional subpoena. Trump says it’s fake.

Trump’s first suit against the Journal was dismissed in April for lacking sufficient claims that the story had been filed with “actual malice” toward Trump, meaning the publication knew the article was false or had recklessly disregarded the truth. It’s a high bar set for libel suits by public figures.

The judge gave Trump time to gather information to support his claims, but denied the president’s request to force the Journal to hand over internal documents and records about the disputed article. The Journal said Trump’s request “betrayed his inability to plead actual malice.”

‘Wonderful Secret’

Trump sued over a July 2025 story that said he’d sent a birthday note to the disgraced financier in 2003, typed within a sketched outline of a naked woman and signed with the president’s signature in the pubic area. The note ends with: “Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.”

Trump, who says he never knew about Epstein’s conduct and cut ties with him before it became public, has repeatedly claimed the note is fake.

“At the time of publication, defendants recklessly disregarded whether the defamatory statements were true and/or they purposefully avoided the discovery of the truth,” Trump’s lawyer, Alejandro Brito, wrote in the amended complaint, which was filed in May.

The newspaper argued in its filing that free-speech rights around matters of public concern are “essential to the common quest for truth and the vitality of society as a whole,” quoting a landmark Supreme Court case on the First Amendment.

“This lawsuit, brought by the President of the United States, subverts this principle,” the Journal said. Trump “has now had a full and fair opportunity to plead a defamation claim against defendants and has twice not done so,” the newspaper said.