Family sues ChatGPT-maker OpenAI over school shooting in Canada
OpenAI has said it considered but didn’t alert police about the activities of the person who months later committed one of Canada’s worst school shootings on Feb. 10.
To refine your search through our archives use our Advanced Search
OpenAI has said it considered but didn’t alert police about the activities of the person who months later committed one of Canada’s worst school shootings on Feb. 10.
The possession case was one of several recent cases he’s listed as a defendant in.
Minnesota case files show officers repeatedly detained people under a reinterpretation of a 1996 law that states that anyone in the U.S. illegally “shall be detained” without bond, indefinitely, even when courts had ordered they be granted a bond hearing or set free.
This is the first time the federal government is known to have used the designation — designed to prevent foreign adversaries from harming national security systems — against a U.S. company.
State leaders warned last fall that teachers could face professional discipline for posts about Kirk’s death.
The case accused Live Nation of using threats, retaliation and other tactics to “suffocate the competition” by controlling virtually every aspect of the industry, from concert promotion to ticketing.
More than 100 Indiana school districts are suing social media developers Meta, TikTok, Snapchat and Google for designing products that allegedly lead to addictive and harmful behavior by adolescents.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Zachary Matthew Loveless v. State of Indiana
No. 25A-CR-1794
Criminal. Appeal from the Hancock Superior Court, Judge Dan E. Marshall. Judge May writes that the court affirms the trial court’s denial of Loveless’s motion to correct error seeking additional credit time after his probation was revoked. Holds Loveless was not entitled to credit toward his Hancock County sentence for time he spent incarcerated in the Marion County and Hamilton County jails because those periods of confinement were connected to separate criminal matters in those counties rather than the Hancock County case. Further holds that under the applicable test for credit time, confinement must result from the charge for which the sentence was imposed, and Loveless’s out-of-county confinement was attributable to other cases. Notes that although the credit time does not apply to the Hancock County sentence, Loveless may seek appropriate credit in the other jurisdictions where the confinement occurred. Judges Altice and Foley concur. Appellant’s attorney: Katherine D. Jack. Appellee’s attorney: Office of the Indiana Attorney General.
This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.
The complaints allege that the producers manipulated the market to raise prices to a record high average of $6.23 a dozen for Grade A Large eggs in March 2025.
Many of us were skeptical, but it caught on and is now widely accepted, with the majority of contested divorces settled.
Xenophobia about Latin America is almost as old as Latin America.
Dozens of foreign companies are selling counterfeit James Dean products online in the United States, according to a federal lawsuit.
Under the PWFA, “undue hardship” means significant difficulty or expense.
The growing complexity of the immigration system fractured the existing network of support available to families.
The Marion County Election Board voted unanimously on Friday to ask state investigators to look into what they suspect is a state law violation by Secretary of State Diego Morales.
“The affected system is unclassified and contains law enforcement sensitive information, including returns from legal process, such as pen register and trap and trace surveillance returns, and personally identifiable information pertaining to subjects of FBI investigations,” said the notification.
Taking the stand for the second day, Musk continued to double down on his assertion that Twitter had a much higher number of fake and spam accounts than the 5% it disclosed in regulatory filings.
The court also said the immunity protections applied even though the man died weeks after then-Gov. Eric Holcomb ended Indiana’s COVID-19 disaster emergency, because the treatment itself arose from care provided during the emergency.
The ruling comes more than three years after the underlying lawsuit was filed, in which plaintiffs argued the state’s abortion ban constituted a “substantial burden” to their religious beliefs under the state’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
The government’s decision to pursue capital punishment came several months after President Donald Trump issued an executive order stating the government should pursue the death penalty in every federal case involving the murder of a law enforcement officer.