To refine your search through our archives use our Advanced Search
Former Venezuelan President Maduro, 63, and his wife, Cilia Flores, 69, have been held at a Brooklyn jail since U.S. forces seized them from their Caracas home in early January.
The federal agencies made the admission about the keywords in signed stipulations filed in federal court last week in a case that’s been ongoing since last spring.
The EEOC voted 2-1 to toss aside a 60-year-old requirement for tens of thousands of private sector employers to submit workforce demographic reports each year.
The company was accused of making false statements regarding the safety of one of its drugs, leading investors to purchase stocks they otherwise would not have.
The panel’s 2-1 ruling late Monday found there is a “substantial” public interest in disclosing the material that Biden wants to keep under wraps.
Michael Meenan, the former information services director for the Indianapolis-based National Federation of High School Associations, was ordered to pay more than $543,000 in restitution.
About 91% of the more than 482,000 books covered by the ruling have been claimed by authors or publishers who are now due payment.
Novo argues that Eli Lilly’s advertisements for its GLP-1 drugs are “deliberately simple and deliberately false,” causing harm to both Novo and “the patients Lilly deceives.”
The Indiana Court of Appeals found the historic property isn’t subject to restoration covenants and can’t be reclaimed by the preservation group.
Zimmer Biomet alleges that a former longtime executive stole company secrets and breached a non-compete agreement after he became the CEO of a leading competitor.
The pilot argues that taking his 1969 Cessna would violate the Eighth Amendment’s “Excessive Fines Clause.”
Twelve states, led by California, sued to block Paramount’s pending buyout of Warner last week.
Lawyers for President Donald Trump and his sprawling business interests are heading to court this week in Florida for high-stakes hearings that follow a pair of major setbacks in their wave of multibillion-dollar lawsuits.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Michael Rodgers v. State of Indiana
No. 26A-CR-88
Appeal from the Huntington Circuit Court, Judge Davin G. Smith. Michael Rodgers was convicted of multiple burglary and theft counts. He contested the sufficiency of evidence regarding his burglary convictions and the trial court’s restitution order. The court affirmed the convictions, stating that the evidence, including the intention of the property owner to return, supported the classification of the structures as dwellings. The court also held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in the restitution order because the victim provided an itemized list of losses directly related to the crimes, consistent with legal standards for restitution. Chief Judge Tavitas authored the opinion, with Judges Bradford and Felix concurring. Appellant’s attorney: Kristina L. Lynn, Lynn Law Office PC, Wabash, Indiana. Appellee’s attorney: Office of the Indiana Attorney General.
This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.
It was the first public statement from Andrew Card since accusations from federal prosecutors came to light alleging that he misused millions of dollars intended for a sports project in northern Indiana.
Blanche faced questioning about the creation of a fund to compensate President Donald Trump’s allies and a tax immunity deal for the president.
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Jacqueline J. Agee and John J. Agee v. Paige N. Hickenbottom, et al.
No. 25-1737 & 25-2180
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Judge Gretchen S. Lund. The court affirmed the dismissal of the claims for malicious prosecution, false arrest and failure to intervene, as well as the denial of leave to amend the complaint to add an abuse-of-process claim. However, the court reversed the denial of leave to add class-of-one equal protection claims, finding that the plaintiffs’ allegations were not futile and warranted further proceedings. Before Judges Hamilton, Maldonado and Taibleson. Judge Hamilton authored the opinion. There were no concurrences or dissents.
This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.
The owners of a warehouse argued that their insurance companies should not have denied their claims for coverage after a fire destroyed the property in December 2022.
Meeting the constitutional residency requirements is generally easier for cities with larger populations, but for smaller cities and towns the standard can be a hinderance.
At its core, a deposition is a formal question-and-answer session conducted under oath.