Articles

Opinions June 10, 2022

Court of Appeals of Indiana

In the Matter of R.A.M.O, Child in Need of Services, D.F., Mother, v. Indiana Department of Child Services
21A-JC-1873
Juvenile CHINS. Affirms the Johnson Circuit Court’s determination that R.A.M.O is a child in need of services. Finds the trial court did not abuse its discretion by resetting the factfinding hearing beyond the 120-day time limit established in Indiana Code section 31-34-11-1(b). Rejects mother’s claims that the juvenile court’s decision to continue the matter violated her right to due process and that she was denied the effective assistance of counsel.

Read More

Opinions June 9, 2022

Thursday’s opinions

Court of Appeals of Indiana 

Five Star Roofing Systems, Inc. D/B/A Five Star Commercial Roofing Systems Inc. v. Armored Guard Window & Door Group, Inc. D/B/A Pendleton Enterprises, Inc.
21A-PL-1964
Civil plenary. Affirms the grant of summary judgment, damages, and attorney fees in favor of Armored Guard Window & Door Group, Inc., doing business as Pendleton Enterprises, Inc. against Five Star Roofing Systems, Inc. Reverses the award of prejudgment interest with respect to the date the prejudgment interest began to accrue. Remands with instructions for the court to determine the appropriate amount of interest from Feb. 9, 2016.

 

Read More

Indiana Court Decisions: May 19-June 1, 2022

7th Circuit Court of Appeals Published May 18, posted to theindianalawyer.com on May 19 Danielle Albert v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security 21-2592 7th Circuit affirms denial of disability benefits, urges petitioner to ‘give work a shot’ A northern Indiana woman who applied for Social Security disability benefits shortly after graduating from high […]

Read More

Opinions June 1, 2022

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Timothy DeWayne Forshee v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
21A-CR-2228
Criminal. Affirms Timothy DeWayne Forshee’s sentence to an aggregate of five years executed for his convictions of three counts of Level 5 felony sexual misconduct with a minor. Finds the Madison Circuit Court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Forshee. Also finds Forshee’s sentence is not inappropriate.

Read More