Opinions

United States of America v. John Holden
22-3160
Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. Judge Robert L. Miller Jr.
Criminal. Reversed the district court’s judgment and reinstated the criminal charge against John Holden. Finds a truthful answer to the question “are you under indictment?” can be material to the propriety of a firearms sale, whether or not all possible applications of §922(n) comport with the Second Amendment.

United States of America v. James E. Snyder
21‐2986
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division. Judge Matthew Kennelly.
Criminal. Affirms James Snyder’s convictions of bribery and obstructing federal revenue laws. Finds Snyder’s Fourth and Sixth Amendment rights weren’t violated when the government got access to his email accounts. Also finds prosecution of the obstruction charge wasn’t barred by the statute of limitations and that there was sufficient evidence. Finally, finds Snyder’s rights to a speedy trial weren’t violated by the delay between the first and second trials for bribery, that 18 U.S.C. § 666 doesn’t require evidence of a prior quid pro quo agreement, and that there was sufficient evidence for conviction.

United States of America ex rel. Michelle Calderon v. Carrington Mortgage Services LLC
22-1553
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Judge Richard Young.
Civil. Affirms the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Carrington Mortgage Services. Finds Michelle Calderon did not proffer evidence that would permit a reasonable trier of fact to find that Carrington’s violations of the False Claims Act caused any harm to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Also finds the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding portions of Calderon’s expert testimony.

Linda Gierek, et al. v. Anonymous 1, et al.
22A-CT-01225
Civil tort. Affirms the Elkhart Superior Court’s ruling that the Indiana Medical Malpractice Act applies to the plaintiffs’ claims. Finds the alleged torts are based on health care provided by the hospital. Reverses the trial court’s ruling that it didn’t have subject matter jurisdiction. Finds granting a motion for class certification would not exceed the scope of the trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction. Remands for a consideration of the plaintiffs’ motions for class certification.

Court of Appeals of Indiana

Netflix Inc., Disney DTC LLC, Hulu LLC, DIRECTTV LLC, Dish Network Corp., and Dish Network L.L.C. v. City of Fishers, Indiana, City of Indianapolis, Indiana, City of Evansville, Indiana, and City of Valparaiso, Indiana on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
22A-PL-1630
Civil plenary. Affirms the Marion Superior Court’s authority to hear the case pursuant to Indiana Declaratory Judgment Act. Finds the streaming services meet the requirements of the IDJA and the trial court properly exercised jurisdiction. Remands with instructions to vacate the denials of the streaming services’ motions to dismiss.

The following 7th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion was posted after IL’s deadline Friday:

United State of America v. Derrick Granger, Clifford R. King Jr., and Eric Walker
21-2874, 21-3056 and 21-3382
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Judge James Sweeney.
Criminal. Affirms convictions of conspiring to distribute heroin and methamphetamine, and firearms offenses, for Derrick Granger, Clifford King and Eric Walker. Finds the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendants’ objections to the seating of a juror. Vacates Walker’s sentence. Remands for resentencing.

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Erie Insurance Exchange v. Myron Corporation
22A-CT-2699
Civil tort. Affirms the Montgomery Superior Court’s denial of Erie Insurance Exchange’s motion to consider Myron Corporation as the manufacturer of a power bank charger in order to apply strict liability, and the trial court’s grant of Myron’s motion to dismiss Erie’s strict liability claim. Finds Erie failed to establish a genuine issue of the material fact that Myron is to be considered the domestic distributor of a power bank charger pursuant to the Indiana Products Liability Act.

Indiana Supreme Court

Donald R. Owen, Jr. v. State of Indiana
21S-LW-333
Life without parole. Affirms Donald Owen’s sentence of life without parole for his conviction of murder. Finds there was sufficient evidence in the Elkhart Circuit Court to find Owen was a major participant and to support two of the statutory aggravators. Also finds the trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining Owen’s proposed jury instructions. Finally, finds the record supports other aggravators.

Court of Appeals of Indiana
IBYH, LLC v. Masiongale Electrical-Mechanical, Inc. (mem. dec.)
22A-PL-2945
Civil plenary. Affirms the denial of IBYH LLC’s motion to correct error, which challenged a grant of summary judgment in favor of Masiongale Electrical-Mechanical Inc. Finds the Delaware Circuit Court did not improvidently grant summary judgment to Masiongale.

Court of Appeals of Indiana
H.P. and S.P. v. G.F.
22A-AD-2674
Adoption. Reverses the Hendricks Superior Court’s judgment granting G.F. grandparent visitation with K.F. Finds G.F. no longer has standing to seek grandparent visitation and his attempt to regain standing by attacking the adoption decree is fruitless given the applicable statute of limitations. Also finds the trial court erred by addressing the merits of the grandfather’s claim for grandparent visitation under the Grandparent Visitation Act.

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Indiana Department of Insurance and Indiana Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Jane Doe and John Doe I, individually and as next friends and legal guardians of John Doe II, an unmarried minor, and Johnathan Cavins and Board of Trustees of Anonymous Hospital
22A-CT-1276
Civil tort. Reverses the denial of the Indiana Department of Insurance and the Patient Compensation Fund’s motion for summary judgment on a claim for excess damages under the Medical Malpractice Act brought by Jane Doe and John Doe I, individually and on behalf of John Doe II. Finds there are no genuine issues of material fact. Also finds the fund is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Remands with instructions. Judge Margret Robb concurs in part and dissents in part with separate opinion.

Court of Appeals of Indiana
In re: The Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of: Na.R. (Minor Child) and N.R. (Father) v. Indiana Department of Child Services (mem. dec.)
22A-JT-2539
Juvenile termination of parental rights. Affirms the involuntary termination of father N.R.’s parental rights to his daughter, Na.R. Finds the Floyd Circuit Court’s findings support its conclusion that the conditions under which the child was removed from N.R.’s care would not be remedied.

Court of Appeals of Indiana
In re the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of T.M. (Minor Child) and M.M. (Mother) M.M. (Mother) v. Indiana Department of Child Services
22A-JT-2628
Juvenile termination of parental rights. Affirms the termination of mother M.M.’s parental rights to T.M. Finds the Cass Circuit Court erred in concluding T.M. had been removed from M.M. for at least six months under a disposition decree, but the error does not warrant reversal. Remands for the entry of a corrected order.

Court of Appeals of Indiana
In re the Adoption of S.K.D.T: K.P. v. L.J. and J.J. (mem. dec.)
23A-AD-65
Adoption. Affirms the Steuben Circuit Court’s conclusion that mother K.P.’s consent to the adoption of S.K.D.T. was not necessary, but reverses the entry of the adoption decree and remands for the trial court to determine whether the adoption will be in the child’s best interest, and whether guardians L.J. and J.J. have sufficient ability to rear the child and furnish suitable support and education for him. Finds the trial court did not clearly err when it concluded that K.P.’s consent to the adoption was not necessary. Also finds the trial court failed to make two required statutory findings before granting the guardians’ petition for adoption.

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Cody Moore v. State of Indiana
22A-CR-1979
Criminal. Affirms the denial of Cody Moore’s motion to suppress. Finds the Marion Superior Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Moore’s motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of a traffic stop.

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Dustin A. Lane v. State of Indiana
22A-CR-2276
Criminal. Revises Dustin Lane’s aggregate sentence from 3,000 days to 300 days and remands to the Lawrence Superior Court to enter a sentencing order consistent with the appellate opinion. Finds Lane has met his burden to demonstrate that his sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of the offenses and his character. Judge Dana Kenworthy dissents with separate opinion.

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Robert A. Kissinger v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
22A-CR-2647
Criminal. Affirms Robert Kissinger’s conviction and 30-year sentence for Level 1 felony child molesting. Finds the DeKalb Circuit Court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a nurse’s report, and even if it did, the error was harmless. Also finds the evidence is sufficient to identify Kissinger as the perpetrator and to support his conviction. Finally, finds Kissinger’s advisory sentence is not an outlier.

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Jordan M. Norton v. State of Indiana
22A-CR-2314
Criminal. Dismisses Jordan Norton’s appeal of his convictions and sentence for battery by means of a deadly weapon, a Level 5 felony, and criminal recklessness, a Level 6 felony. Finds Norton was not entitled to file a belated notice of appeal. Judge Leanna Weissmann dissents with separate opinion.

Court of Appeals of Indiana
James H. Higgason III v. State of Indiana
22A-CR-2000
Criminal. Affirms James Higgason III’s three convictions of murder. Finds the Lake Superior Court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Higgason’s motion to dismiss and motion for mistrial. Also finds the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it admitted the digitized recording of the phone calls between David Copley and Higgason. Finally, finds any error in the trial court’s decision to not notify counsel when the jury asked a question about Higgason’s culpability was harmless because Higgason did not establish prejudice. and there was sufficient evidence to convict Higgason of the murders.