Appeals court upholds $112M damages judgment for Carmel spine surgeon

  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

The Indiana Court of Appeals has upheld a northern Indiana jury’s award of more than $112 million for a Carmel spine surgeon who won a royalty battle against medical device manufacturers.

The appellate court’s ruling leaves undisturbed a jury’s award of damages after a 15-day trial in Plymouth in 2018. A Marshall Circuit Court jury awarded Dr. Rick Sasso $112,452,269 in his breach of contract lawsuit against Medtronic Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek Inc. and Warsaw Orthopedic Inc.

Sasso sued the companies, claiming they had violated a contract by not paying royalties he was due for spinal implants and screw-implant systems he had invented and sold to the company more than a decade ago. The systems became one of the company’s largest product lines, with annual sales of more than $200 million.

Along the way, Medtronic paid Sasso more than $20 million in royalties, but he contended the company stopped paying him several years ago, breaching its obligations and acting in bad faith.

A six-person jury in Marshall Circuit Court returned the verdict in favor of Sasso, wrapping up a nearly month-long trial.

A panel of the Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment in all respects on Friday in a 45-page memorandum decision. The case is Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc., Medtronic, Inc., and Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. v. Rick C. Sasso, M.D. (mem. dec.), 19A-PL-378.

The panel rejected the Medtronic defendants’ claims that the case should have been dismissed on jurisdictional grounds and that the companies were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The court also found that sufficient evidence supported the jury’s award of damages. The appeals court rejected Sasso’s cross-appeal seeking punitive damages.

“In short, the jury’s award of damages … is supported by the evidence,” Judge Paul Mathias wrote. “Accepting Medtronic’s contrary arguments would require us to reweigh the evidence and come to a contrary conclusion, which we may not do.”

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Subscribe Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Subscribe Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Upgrade Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Upgrade Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer!

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In