May 12, 2026

  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Joel Thomas Meyer v. State of Indiana
No. 24A-CR-3025

Appeal from the Madison Circuit Court, Judge Angela Warner Sims. Meyer was found guilty of Level 1 felony attempted murder and Level 3 felony criminal confinement after severely attacking his fiancée. He appealed, claiming the officers’ warrantless entry into his home was unconstitutional and that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. The court affirmed his convictions, ruling that the officers acted reasonably under exigent circumstances due to visible blood and a history of domestic violence. The case was remanded for a correction in the judgment regarding the merger of the aggravated battery conviction into the attempted murder conviction. Judge Scheele authored the opinion, with Judge May concurring and Chief Judge Tavitas concurring in part. Appellant’s attorneys: Jennifer Jones Auger, Law Office of Jennifer Auger, Franklin, Indiana; Andrew J. Baldwin and Kinsey H. Chaney, Baldwin, Perry & Wiley PC, Franklin, Indiana. Appellee’s attorney: Office of the Indiana Attorney General.

Court of Appeals of Indiana
In the Matter of N.C. (Minor Child), A Child in Need of Services and D.C. (Father), Appellant-Respondent v. Indiana Department of Child Services, Appellee-Petitioner and Kids’ Voice of Indiana, Appellee-Guardian Ad Litem
No. 25A-JC-2526

Appeal from the Marion Superior Court, Judge Tara Y. Melton and Magistrate Leon A. Keith. D.C. appeals the trial court’s determination that his daughter, N.C., is a Child in Need of Services (CHINS). The court affirmed a finding of no reasonable efforts required for reunification based on D.C.’s prior conviction of child molesting, concluding that sufficient evidence supported this decision and the CHINS adjudication. The court also upheld the constitutionality of the applicable statute and denied D.C.’s motion to reconsider the no reasonable efforts finding. Judge Scheele authored the opinion, with Judges Bailey and Vaidik concurring. Appellant’s attorney: Daniel G. Foote, Foote Law Office, Indianapolis, Indiana. Appellee’s attorney: Office of the Indiana Attorney General. Attorney for Appellee — Guardian Ad Litem: Katherine Grace Meger Kelsey, Indianapolis, Indiana.

This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Subscribe Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Subscribe Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Upgrade Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Upgrade Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer!

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In