Opinions January 12, 2026

  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Indiana Court of Appeals
State of Indiana v. Penny C. Lane, Michael G. Lane, and Keely Garrison
25A-DC-2328

Domestic relations. Appeal from the Boone Circuit Court. Judges Lori N. Schein and Robert W. Freese. Reverses the trial court’s order finding S.L. emancipated and terminating Penny Lane’s child support obligation. Holds the record does not support emancipation under Indiana Code § 31-16-6-6 because there was no evidence that S.L. initiated action placing himself outside parental control or that he was self-supporting. Finds the trial court erred by granting emancipation and terminating support without a hearing and without competent evidence, relying on Indiana Supreme Court precedent requiring both the child’s initiative and self-support for emancipation. Remands with child support obligation reinstated. Attorneys for appellant: Attorney General Theodore E. Rokita, Deputy Attorney General Alexandria Sons. Attorney for appellee Penny Lane: Tara L. Cragen.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Subscribe Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Subscribe Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Upgrade Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Upgrade Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer!

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In