Oct. 20, 2026

  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Indiana Court of Appeals
Joy Rugenstein v. Tyson Rugenstein
No. 25A-DC-2926
Appeal from the Morgan Circuit Court, Judge Matthew G. Hanson. The court affirmed the trial court’s provisional order granting custody of the parties’ child to Father and allowing Mother supervised visitation. Mother contended her due process rights were violated when the trial court held an unrecorded attorney conference instead of a hearing, impacting her ability to mount a defense. The court held that Mother’s various opportunities to present her case in earlier hearings and her verified statement of evidence provided adequate means to address her claims. Therefore, the court found no violation of due process. Judge May authored the opinion, with Judges Pyle and Scheele concurring. Attorney for appellant: Joy Rugenstein, pro se.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Jeremy Tyler Ferrell v. State of Indiana
No. 25A-CR-3215
Appeal from the Hancock Superior Court, Judge Donald J. Davis. The court affirmed Jeremy Ferrell’s sentence of 22 years following his retrial and conviction for two counts of Level 3 felony aggravated battery. Ferrell challenged the increased sentence as a violation of the due process clause, arguing it was vindictive after his successful first appeal. The court found no due process violation, noting the trial judge appropriately considered new information from jail phone calls that revealed a lack of remorse, justifying the harsher sentence. Judge DeBoer authored the opinion, with Judges Felix and Scheele concurring. Attorney for appellant: Lisa Johnson, Brownsburg. Attorneys for appellee: Office of the Indiana Attorney General.

7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Nos. 23-3159, 23-3175, 23-3363 and 23-3385
Appeals from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Chief Judge James R. Sweeney II and Judges Matthew P. Brookman and Sarah Evans Barker. Before Circuit Judges Jackson-Akiwumi, Lee and Kolar. The 7th Circuit affirmed orders returning four lawsuits against health care providers to state court after patients alleged their private health information was improperly shared through website tracking technology. The providers argued that the cases belonged in federal court because they operated online patient portals under federal electronic health record requirements and financial incentives. The appeals court rejected that argument, holding that compliance with federal regulations did not mean the hospitals were acting under federal authority because their patient portals served private purposes and were not subject to detailed federal supervision or control. Circuit Judge Lee authored the opinion.

This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Subscribe Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Subscribe Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Upgrade Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer! Upgrade Now

Get full access to The Indiana Lawyer!

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In