Search Results

Indiana Court of Appeals
Joshua Anselm v. Ashley Anselm
19A-DC-2728
Domestic relation with children. Affirms the Jasper Superior Court’s award of primary physical custody of Joshua and Ashley Anselm’s children to Ashley. Reverses the order that Joshua pay for all uninsured medical expenses, and the award of $16,500 to Ashley. Finds the dissolution court entered sufficient findings and did not abuse its discretion when it awarded Ashley primary physical custody, and the court did not err when it relied on an unsigned child support worksheet to calculate Joshua’s child support obligation. But, finds the dissolution court did err when it ordered Joshua to both pay the recommended amount of child support and all uninsured health care expenses for the children. Finally, finds the dissolution court erred in awarding Ashley $16,500 based on its conclusion that the parties had $33,000 in equity in their home. Remands with instructions for the trial court to either order Ashley to pay for the first $951.60 in medical expenses or to credit Joshua with that amount toward his child support obligation, and to split the actual equity of about $10,600 between the parties.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Joseph D. Reed v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
19A-CR-2187
Criminal. Affirms Joseph Reed’s 8½-year sentence for conviction in Wayne Superior Court of Level 5 felony battery resulting in bodily injury to a public safety official with a habitual offender enhancement. Finds his sentence is not inappropriate in light of the nature of his offense and his character.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Kurtis L. Shorter v. State of Indiana
18A-CR-02957
Criminal. Affirms Kurtis Shorter’s aggregate 30-year sentence for conviction of Level 4 felony unlawful possession of a handgun by a serious violent felon, Class A misdemeanor possession of a synthetic drug, Class B misdemeanor possession of marijuana and his habitual offender adjudication. Finds the Elkhart Superior Court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the challenged evidence at trial. Finds the evidence is sufficient to sustain Shorter’s convictions and that the trial court did not err in denying Shorter’s motion to dismiss the habitual-offender enhancement.