To refine your search through our archives use our Advanced Search
The suit argues that the Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commission erred when it approved a rezoning that will allow developer Metrobloks to build a $500 million small-scale data center on a 14-acre site near Brightwood Plaza.
The settlement, which involves several retailers, comes nearly two years after a complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana accusing Elanco of monopolizing the market in violation of the federal Sherman Act and state antitrust lawsuits.
A redacted copy of the 100-page proposal submitted by Sky Dine to the St. Joseph County Airport Authority was filed Tuesday as an exhibit in ongoing litigation brought by South Bend Chocolate Co. founder Mark Tarner.
Court of Appeals of Indiana
North River Insurance Company and RiverStone Claims Management LLC v. Landis+Gyr Technology, Inc.
No. 25A-PL-375
Appeal from the Tippecanoe Superior Court, Judge Randy J. Williams. Landis+Gyr Technology, Inc. sued North River Insurance Company and RiverStone Claims Management LLC for insurance coverage related to pollution remediation costs at a former manufacturing site. The trial court initially granted partial summary judgment in favor of Landis, awarding over $10 million. On appeal, the court reversed this decision, ruling that the North River policies did not apply under New York law due to the pro rata allocation approach, which would yield no liability for North River, as the damages did not exceed the policy’s attachment point. The court remanded the case for the entry of summary judgment for the defendants on all claims. Judge Vaidik authored the opinion, with Judges Mathias and Pyle concurring. Appellants’ attorneys: Erik Mroz, Elizabeth S. Straw, Drewry Simmons Vornehm LLP, Carmel, Indiana; Bryan H. Babb, Bradley M. Dick, Bose McKinney & Evans LLP, Indianapolis, Indiana; John D. LaBarbera, Bevin Carroll, Kennedys Law LLP, Chicago, Illinois. Appellee’s attorney: Brent W. Huber, Jenny R. Buchheit, Robert A. Jorczak, Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis, Indiana.
This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.
John Murphy sued the city of South Bend in 2024 after he stepped into a pothole and suffered a leg injury. Murphy accused the city of negligent failure to maintain its streets.
Speakers shared wisdom and encouragement with Indiana’s newest legal professionals and reflected on the role of attorneys in the United States as the country celebrates its 250th anniversary this year.
The action thriller “The Rip” used too many real-life details in its fictionalized narrative, causing harm to the officers’ personal and professional reputations, the officers claim in their defamation lawsuit.
Musk, the world’s richest man, is seeking Altman’s ouster from the company leadership as part of a civil lawsuit accusing him of betraying their shared vision for OpenAI.
State Sen. Mike Bohacek announced on Monday his plans to draft 2027 legislation that would legalize medical marijuana in Indiana and establish regulations governing its sale, distribution and use.
Court of Appeals of Indiana
Joel Thomas Meyer v. State of Indiana
No. 24A-CR-3025
Appeal from the Madison Circuit Court, Judge Angela Warner Sims. Meyer was found guilty of Level 1 felony attempted murder and Level 3 felony criminal confinement after severely attacking his fiancée. He appealed, claiming the officers’ warrantless entry into his home was unconstitutional and that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. The court affirmed his convictions, ruling that the officers acted reasonably under exigent circumstances due to visible blood and a history of domestic violence. The case was remanded for a correction in the judgment regarding the merger of the aggravated battery conviction into the attempted murder conviction. Judge Scheele authored the opinion, with Judge May concurring and Chief Judge Tavitas concurring in part. Appellant’s attorneys: Jennifer Jones Auger, Law Office of Jennifer Auger, Franklin, Indiana; Andrew J. Baldwin and Kinsey H. Chaney, Baldwin, Perry & Wiley PC, Franklin, Indiana. Appellee’s attorney: Office of the Indiana Attorney General.
This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.
Federal government payments to keep immigration detainees at an Indiana prison are lagging by five months, according to monthly reporting released under a new state law.
Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP announced that a new managing partner will take over beginning in January 2028.
According to case documents, Michael Deppe’s suspension stems from a medical malpractice case that was transferred to him after the client’s original attorney was also suspended from the practice.
Indiana invested millions of dollars into its Plainfield law enforcement academy. Here’s what changed — and why state leaders say the upgrades were needed.
Sheriffs across Indiana say transfer times have improved in recent months. But many said the gains haven’t fully eased overcrowding as sentencing rates continue to outpace prison pick-ups in some counties.
Court of Appeals of Indiana
In the Matter of the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of C.J.B. (Minor Child); A.B. (Father), Appellant-Respondent v. Indiana Department of Child Services, Appellee-Petitioner
No. 25A-JT-3154
Appeal from the Dearborn Circuit Court, Judge F. Aaron Negangard. A.B. (“Father”) appeals the termination of his parental rights to C.J.B. (“Child”), arguing that the trial court erred by denying his motion for a continuance of the fact-finding hearing while he was incarcerated. The court concludes that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion and that the denial did not violate Father’s due process rights. Father failed to demonstrate good cause for the continuance, did not follow the procedural requirements, and his lack of communication further indicated a lack of interest in the proceedings. Chief Judge Tavitas authored the opinion. Judges Bailey and Foley concur. Appellant’s attorney: R. Patrick Magrath, West Sixth Law LLP, Madison, Indiana. Appellee’s attorney: Office of the Indiana Attorney General.
This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.
The lawsuit comes after state authorities disclosed that ChatGPT gave information to the shooter about time and location to maximize victims on campus, as well as the type of gun and ammunition to use.
It’s a moment cybersecurity experts have warned about for years: malicious hackers arming themselves with AI to supercharge their ability to break into the world’s computers.
Attorneys for co-founders Chris Seger and Drew Sanders disagreed about the impact of the decision.
Matthew McConaughey and Taylor Swift are among those who are using trademark registration as possible protection again misuse involving artificial intelligence.
