To refine your search through our archives use our Advanced Search
The payment — representing the $5 million jury award, plus interest — was made Monday from an account where it had been held in escrow since the 2023 verdict, according to court records.
Indiana Court of Appeals
VoCare, Inc. v. AGS Capital, LLC, et al.
No. 25A-CC-2413
Appeal from the Hamilton Superior Court, Judge Michael A. Casati. VoCare, Inc. appeals the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of AGS Capital, LLC and other investors. The court determined that the investors established a prima facie case for breach of contract due to VoCare’s non-payment on convertible promissory notes. VoCare’s arguments regarding the illegality of the notes and impossibility of performance were deemed waived and unpersuasive, as the trial court had no opportunity to address them. The court affirmed the trial court’s order. Judge Scheele authored the opinion, with Judges Bailey and Vaidik concurring. Appellant’s attorneys: Katherine M. Haire and Anthony L. Holton, Reminger Co. LPA, Indianapolis, Indiana; and Joseph S. Simms, Reminger Co. LPA, Cleveland, Ohio. Appellee’s attorneys: Jonathan D. Mattingly and Jeffrey N. Furminger, Mattingly Burke Cohen & Biederman LLP, Indianapolis, Indiana.
This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.
Indiana’s pharmacy regulators reluctantly approved the disciplinary settlement over what they describe as one of the largest known drug theft cases in state history.
The appellate court held that Teva plausibly alleged that Lilly breached the two companies’ 2018 settlement agreement, which stipulated that Lilly would not interfere with Teva getting approval for a generic version of Lilly’s osteoporosis drug, Forteo.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana is suing several branches of the Monroe County government in federal court for what the organization argues are unconstitutional conditions at the Monroe County Jail.
The settlement resolves allegations from 46 states that Block Inc. deceived its users about the safety of Cash App and failed to provide promised fraud protections.
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.
No. 25-2125
Civil. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Judge Matthew P. Brookman. Reverses the district court’s dismissal of generic drug manufacturer Teva’s breach-of-contract claim and remands for further proceedings. The court ruled that Teva plausibly alleged breaches of the settlement agreement between it and Lilly regarding the entry of a generic version of osteoporosis drug Forteo, concluding that the agreement’s terms could be interpreted as still in effect despite the expiration of the relevant patents. Judge Hamilton authored the opinion. Judges Jackson-Akiwumi and Kolar concur. Appellant’s attorneys: Darren A. Craig and Kandi Kilkelly Hidde, FBT Gibbons, Indianapolis; Christopher Holding, Brian Timothy Burgess and Jesse Lempel, Goodwin Procter, Boston. Apellee’s attorneys: Melissa Arbus Sherry, Mark Zubick and Gabriel K. Bell, Latham & Watkins, Washington, D.C.; Deborah Pollack-Milgate, Barnes & Thornburg, Indianapolis.
This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.
The scathing decision referred one of President Trump’s lawyers for potential disciplinary action and characterized the $10 billion complaint as an exercise in self-dealing.
As the AI industry moves from selling chatbots to providing agents that can complete complex tasks autonomously over long periods of time, the question of who should be held responsible when something goes wrong is becoming more urgent.
Apple said in the lawsuit filed in a California federal court that OpenAI encouraged Apple employees it was recruiting to share confidential information, even guiding how to avoid scrutiny when taking jobs at the other company.
Mindi Metzinger was charged with three counts of obstruction of justice and one count of assisting a criminal in connection to the plot to kill Tippecanoe County Judge Steven Meyer earlier this year.
The plaintiff has filed about two dozen copyright infringement lawsuits across the country this year alone.
The judge found that a law giving Gov. Mike Braun full control of Indiana University’s Board of Trustee membership is constitutional, ruling against a would-be candidate who alleged it was unjust special legislation.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Latrell Vaughn v. State of Indiana
No. 26A-CR-306
Appeal from the St. Joseph Superior Coirt, Judge David L. Francisco. Vaughn appeals his 40-year sentence for robbery resulting in serious bodily injury, asserting that his appeal should be permitted despite an appeal waiver in his plea agreement. The court finds that Vaughn has waived appellate review of his sentence as the waiver explicitly covered his challenges, including the firearm enhancement and the proportionality of his sentence. The court concludes that Vaughn’s arguments do not fit the exceptions to enforcing such waivers. Judge Felix authored the opinion, with Chief Judge Tavitas and Judge Bradford concurring. Appellant’s attorney: A. Robert Masters, St. Joseph County Deputy Public Defender, Nemeth, Feeney Masters & Campiti PC, South Bend, Indiana. Appellee’s attorney: Office of the Indiana Attorney General.
This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.
A Hendricks County judge has now accepted the case after months of judicial turnover in Morgan and Hendricks counties.
With a vast network of investigators worldwide and tools not readily accessible to most people, Roziere digs deep into high-stakes cases, locating corporate assets, skip-tracing witnesses, interviewing government officials and obtaining hard-to-find documents.
Although the technology behind clinical documentation is evolving, the role of the medical record itself remains unchanged.
The end result is a commanding courtroom presence that juries don’t just see but will feel.
Growth within McCarter’s Indianapolis office has been consistent since taking root in the Hoosier state.
The cases were dropped based on a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that upheld state bans on transgender athletes in girls’ sports.
