Home » Search

Search Results

7579 results for 'articles'

To refine your search through our archives use our Advanced Search

Oct. 22, 2026

Indiana Court of Appeals  
David Lee Morgan v. NextGear Capital, Inc.
No. 26A-PL-935  
David Lee Morgan, pro se, appeals the trial court’s order granting NextGear Capital Inc.’s motion for summary judgment on its breach of guaranty claim. The court found no genuine issues of material fact regarding Morgan’s liability for dealer’s debt, but Morgan raised a substantial issue concerning the commercial reasonableness of NextGear’s disposition of the collateral. The appellate court determined that there was indeed a genuine issue of material fact about whether the collateral was disposed of in a commercially reasonable manner, leading to a reversal and remand for further proceedings. Judge Bailey authored the opinion, with Judges Bradford and Altice concurring. Appellant pro se: David Lee Morgan, Chuckey, Tennessee. Appellee attorneys: David J. Jurkiewicz, Nathan T. Danielson, Seema R. Shah, Bose McKinney & Evans LLP, Indianapolis.
This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.

Oct. 20, 2026

Indiana Court of Appeals
Jeremy Tyler Ferrell v. State of Indiana
No. 25A-CR-3215
Appeal from the Hancock Superior Court, Judge Donald J. Davis. The court affirmed Jeremy Ferrell’s sentence of 22 years following his retrial and conviction for two counts of Level 3 felony aggravated battery. Ferrell challenged the increased sentence as a violation of the due process clause, arguing it was vindictive after his successful first appeal. The court found no due process violation, noting the trial judge appropriately considered new information from jail phone calls that revealed a lack of remorse, justifying the harsher sentence. Judge DeBoer authored the opinion, with Judges Felix and Scheele concurring. Attorney for appellant: Lisa Johnson, Brownsburg. Attorneys for appellee: Office of the Indiana Attorney General.

This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.

Oct. 19, 2026

Indiana Court of Appeals
C.J.W v. T.H.
No. 26A-AD-1225
Appeal from the Gibson Circuit Court, Judge Jeffrey F. Meade. The court affirmed the trial court’s decision to grant T.H.’s petition to adopt his stepson, finding that consent of the biological father, C.J.W. was not required. The court determined that T.H.’s conviction for criminal recklessness was over five years old at the time of the hearing, thus not disqualifying him from adoption. It also concluded that C.J.W. had failed to maintain significant communication with the child for more than a year, which justified bypassing his consent. Additionally, the court found that the adoption was in the child’s best interest, emphasizing the stable and loving environment provided by T.H. Judge DeBoer authored the opinion, with Judges Foley and Felix concurring. Attorney for appellant: Cara Schaefer Wieneke, Wieneke Law Office LLC, Brooklyn. Attorney for appellee: Jason Spindler, Spindler Law, Princeton.

This content was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence and has been reviewed by an editor for accuracy.