To refine your search through our archives use our Advanced Search
Speakers: • Jennifer Bonar Gray, KPMG Washington National Tax Date: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 Time (ET): noon – 1:00 pm Credit hours: 1.0 CLE (distance education credit) Cost: Click here or visit www.indybar.org for program costs Location: live webinar via Zoom conferencing (An access link will be emailed to you prior to the event.) Provider: […]
Speakers: • Jonathan Bont Paganelli Law Group • Ian Goodman, Paganelli Law Group Date: Thursday, July 8, 2021 Time (ET): 4:00 pm – 5:00 pm Credit hours: 1.0 CLE (distance education credit) Cost: Click here or visit www.indybar.org for program costs Location: live webinar via Zoom conferencing (An access link will be emailed to you […]
Speakers: • Joseph Leone, Drewry Simmons Vornehm LLP • Melissa Hamer-Bailey, Norris Choplin Schroeder LLP • Jim Strenski, Paganelli Law Group Date: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 Time (ET): noon – 1:00 pm Credit hours: 1.0 CLE (distance education credit) Cost: Click here or visit www.indybar.org for program costs Location: live webinar via Zoom conferencing (An […]
Speakers: • MaryEllen Bishop, Cohen Garelick & Glazier PC • Micah Nichols, Krieg DeVault LLP Date: Wednesday, June 30, 2021 Time (ET): 4:00 pm – 5:00 pm Credit hours: 1.0 CLE (distance education credit) Cost: Click here or visit www.indybar.org for program costs Location: live webinar via Zoom conferencing (An access link will be emailed […]
Speakers: • Morgan Decker, Rubin & Levin PC • Jane Glynn, Glynn Law LLC Date: Wednesday, June 30, 2021 Time (ET): noon – 1:00 pm Credit hours: 1.0 CLE (distance education credit for those who register for virtual option) Cost: Click here or visit www.indybar.org for program costs Location: In-person: 140 N. Illinois St., Indianapolis, […]
Speakers: • Annmarie Giblin, Giblin Law PLLC • Ivy Grey, WordRake • Chris Grippa, Aprio • Eric Hewlett, Kightlinger & Gray LLP • E.J. Hilbert, KCECyber • Jeff Kramer, Aprio Date: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 Time (ET): 2:00 pm – 3:00 pm Credit hours: 1.0 CLE (distance education credit) Cost: Click here or visit www.indybar.org […]
Eight students, including an incoming law student, have filed a lawsuit against Indiana University, claiming the school’s policy requiring students to be inoculated against COVID-19 is “irrational and unreasonable” because “the pandemic is virtually over, herd immunity has been achieved and there is extremely minimal risk of COVID to IU students.”
Indiana Supreme Court
State of Indiana v. Justin Jones
21S-CR-50
Criminal. Reverses an order requiring a confidential informant in Justin Jones’ case to have a face-to-face interview with opposing counsel. Finds that an informant’s identity is inherently revealed through their physical appearance at a face-to-face interview. Also finds that when a defendant requests such an interview, the state has met its threshold burden to show the informer’s privilege applies. Finally, finds the Marion Superior Court did not apply the established balancing test before ordering disclosure. Remands.
It’s now up to a trial court to calculate credit time and determine whether a man who was released from prison too soon should be reincarcerated or remain free, the Indiana Supreme Court wrote in a Monday reversal.
A federal judge said he’ll soon decide whether to block a new Indiana law that would require doctors to tell women undergoing drug-induced abortions about a disputed treatment for potentially stopping the abortion process.
An order requiring a confidential informant to undergo a face-to-face interview with defense counsel has been reversed by the Indiana Supreme Court, which found that an individual’s identity would be inherently revealed through their physical appearance at such an interview.
The Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council has announced James “Brad” Landwerlen of Shelby County as the newest chair to lead its board of directors.
A public defender and an attorney with the Indiana Department of Child Services have been appointed by Gov. Eric Holcomb to serve as judges in Clark County’s two new superior courts.
The Indianapolis-based NCAA has taken another hit in court, this time at the highest level, and yet insists it is an isolated setback and not a major step toward bringing down its version of amateurism. Legal analysts agree with that — at least until the next court challenge comes. And they seem sure to come.
The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that Congress erred when it set up a board to oversee patent disputes by failing to make the judges properly accountable to the president.
A federal judge dismissed most claims filed by activists and civil liberties groups who accused the Trump administration of violating the civil rights of protesters who were forcefully removed by police before then-President Donald Trump walked to a church near the White House for a photo op.
The Democrats’ expansive elections and voting bill is all but certain to be rejected in a key test vote in the Senate, providing a dramatic example of Republicans’ use of the filibuster to block legislation and forcing hard questions for Democrats over next steps.
The Supreme Court decided unanimously Monday that the NCAA can’t enforce rules limiting education-related benefits — like computers and paid internships — that colleges offer to student-athletes, a ruling that could help push changes in how the student-athletes are compensated.
Indiana Court of Appeals
David K. and Jane A. Burton, et al. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Madison County, and Lone Oak Solar, LLC
20A-MI-2186
Miscellaneous. Affirms the denial of neighbors David and Jane Burton, Bob and Jean Mills, Curtis and Rebecca Harrison, Kara and Richard Brown, Ross and Katrina Hunter, Joshua Hiday, John Doe and Jane Doe’s petition for judicial review in favor of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Madison County and Lone Oak Solar Energy LLC. Finds the votes of BZA members Mary Jane Baker and Beth VanSickle in favor of Lone Oak were valid and that there was substantial evidence to support Lone Oak’s special use applications and setback variances.
The votes of two Madison County Board of Zoning Appeals members regarding a disputed solar energy project were valid, the Indiana Court of Appeals has ruled. It also held that the board’s approval of special use applications and setback variances were supported by substantial evidence.