Indiana Court of Appeals
Herco, LLC v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
20A-PL-1682
Civil plenary. Affirms the grant of summary judgment in favor of Auto-Owners Insurance Company in a dispute with Homeowners’ Equity & Realty Corporation LLC. Finds HERCO’s second suit is barred by res judicata. Also finds HERCO could have raised its breach of contract and bad faith claims in the first suit in Lake Superior Court but chose not to do so.
A son who inherited the family business from his father must make his assets available for an appraisal after the Indiana Court of Appeals determined he may have received a “gift” subject to an abatement.
A trial court properly rejected a second lawsuit brought by a Gary property owner who had already sued its insurer for coverage in a previous case involving the same parties, losses and issues, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday.
Indiana Court of Appeals
The City of Bloomington, et al. v. Andrew Guenther, et al. (mem. dec.)
20A-MI-1900
Miscellaneous. Affirms the denial of the motion to dismiss filed by the city of Bloomington, Mayor John Hamilton, Christopher Cockerham and Nicholas Kappas, which challenged the amended verified complaint for declaratory judgment and writ of quo warranto filed by William Ellis and Andrew Guenther in reference to a Planning Commission appointment. Finds the petitioners have stated sufficient facts to demonstrate that they have standing to bring their complaint for declaratory judgment and request for a writ of quo warranto. Also finds the Monroe Circuit Court did not err in denying the motion to dismiss.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Dawn Riddle and Matthew Riddle v. Syed J. Khan, Chaitanya Chekkilla, and Christopher H. Scruton
20A-PL-1441
Civil plenary. Affirms the grant of summary judgment to Dr. Syed J. Khan, Dr. Chaitanya Chekkilla and Christopher J. Scruton on the claim brought by Dawn and Matthew Riddle under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for allegedly treating the Riddles’ children without permission. Finds undisputed evidence from which the Tipton Circuit Court could have determined the Riddles were aware of Khan’s alleged violations, which fell outside the statute of limitations period, and Khan’s actions were not part of a continuing wrong that extended the statute of limitations period as to him. Also finds Scruton was not entitled to summary judgment on the statute of limitations period, but because there was no material evidence showing he joined or conspired with the Indiana Department of Child Services to deprive the Riddles of their constitutional rights and no dispute of material fact that he actually deprived them of a constitutionally protected right, he was entitled to summary judgment on those grounds. Finally, finds the Riddles have not presented or designated evidence to establish that Chekkilla was a state employee or that she conspired or joined with any state officials to deprive the Riddles of their constitutional rights of any kind.
The Supreme Court of the United States sided Monday with Google in an $8 billion copyright dispute with Oracle over the internet company’s creation of the Android operating system used on most smartphones worldwide.
A federal judge has dismissed the latest attempt by property owners in a northwestern Indiana town to deny public access to Lake Michigan beaches.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Anthony Hughes, et al. v. First American Title Insurance Co.
20A-PL-01850
Civil plenary. Affirms the Howard Circuit Court order granting summary judgment to First American in litigation filed by Anthony Hughes seeking damages related to an easement not disclosed in a title examination and for a judgment entered against Hughes in a related lawsuit. Finds the Hughes parties should be reimbursed as the trial court ruled, for the actual loss they suffered in reliance on their policy of title insurance, and such loss is the diminution in value of the property caused by the existence of the easement.
The Supreme Court of the United States on Thursday unanimously upheld federal regulators’ decision to ease ownership limits on local media, rejecting a claim that the change would hurt minority and female ownership.
Indiana Court of Appeals
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company v. Beverly M. Kennedy
20A-PL-837
Civil plenary. Affirms in part, reverses in part and enters full summary judgment in favor of Lincoln National on its complaint for declaratory judgment pertaining to a group long-term disability benefits policy. Concludes that Lincoln National was entitled to full summary judgment as a matter of law based on the policy’s provisions, and therefore, reverses the Washington Circuit Court’s grant of partial summary judgment to Kennedy. Concludes that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it ordered that Lincoln National was entitled to reimbursement of overpaid benefits, subject to interest.
Read Indiana appellate court decisions from the most recent reporting period.
Northern Indiana property owners were relieved of the bulk of a court order requiring them to pay more than $48,000 to connect to a sewer system, including a ruling on appeal voiding an award of more than $20,000 in attorney fees to the sewer district.
A man considered to be an accomplice of an armed pharmacy robber could not convince the Indiana Court of Appeals on Tuesday that his decades-long sentence was inappropriate.
Indiana Court of Appeal
Clark County REMC v. Glenn Reis, Dale Bottorff, Jimmie Sanders, and Steve Stumler
20A-CT-622
Civil tort. Affirms the grant of summary judgment to Glenn Reis, Dale Bottorff, Jimmie Sanders and Steve Stumler on their breach of contract claim against Clark County REMC. Finds that because there was mutuality of obligation under a policy granting health insurance benefits to certain former directors of Clark County REMC, the Clark Circuit Court did not err by finding the policy to be a contract. Also finds the trial court’s ruling was not contrary to public policy. Judge L. Mark Bailey dissents with separate opinion.
A local utility breached its contract with its former directors when it revoked their health insurance coverage, a majority of the Indiana Court of Appeals has ruled. A dissenting judge, however, found that the majority engaged in a “logical fallacy” in holding that the utility was obligated to continue providing coverage to the plaintiffs.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Brent C. Faulk v. Callie J. (Bissell) Faulk
20A-DC-1432
Domestic relations with children. Affirms and reverses in part the decree dissolving the marriage of Brent C. and Callie J. Bissell Faulk. Finds the Boone Superior Court erred in changing Brent and Callie Faulk’s child’s surname and in calculating mother’s income. Also finds the trial court did not err in calculating father’s income or in placing limits on his opportunities for additional parenting time. Remands with instructions to vacate the child’s surname change and to include the value of mother’s in-kind benefits in the calculation of her weekly gross income for child support purposes. Judge Patricia Riley concurs and dissents in part with separate opinion.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Indiana Department of Transportation v. FMG Indianapolis LLC, et al.
20A-PL-215
Civil plenary. Reverses the Hamilton Superior Court’s order that reversed an Indiana Department of Transportation ruling revoking billboard permits held by FMG Indianapolis. Concludes INDOT’s order revoking FMG’s sign permit and ordering that one of the signs be removed is not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance law.
The following Indiana Supreme Court opinion was posted after IL deadline Wednesday:
Byron D. Harris, Jr. v. State of Indiana
20S-CR-546
Criminal. Affirms Byron Harris Jr.’s conviction in adult court of attempted murder. Finds that a child in adult criminal court may use Evidence Rule 615(c) to establish that a parent is “essential” to the presentation of the defense and is thus excluded from a witness-separation order. However, also finds Harris did not make the requisite showing under the rule, nor did he show he had a due process right. Finally, finds the Elkhart Circuit Court did not abuse its discretion when it did not sentence Harris under the alternative juvenile sentencing scheme, and his sentence of 37 years is not inappropriate in light of the nature of his offense and his character.
A man who set fire to a government building to destroy evidence of pornography constituting parole violations will have one of his arson convictions vacated after the Indiana Court of Appeals used recent caselaw to find a double jeopardy violation.
The following 7th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion was posted after IL deadline Tuesday:
United States of America v. Stanford Wylie
19-2140
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. Senior Judge Robert L. Miller Jr.
Criminal. Vacates the portion of Stanford Wylie’s sentence that imposes five years of supervised release. Finds the district court erred in finding it was required to impose a five-year term of supervised release. Remands to reconsider the length of Wylie’s supervised release and for further proceedings.