Indiana Court of Appeals
State of Indiana v. Frederick Obryan McFarland
18A-CR-2408
Criminal. Affirms the Vanderburgh Superior Court’s denial of the state’s motion to amend the habitual offender charging information against Frederick McFarland filed three calendar days before his trial on multiple charges related to a fatal car crash allegedly cause after McFarland fled an attempted traffic stop. Finds no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s ruling.
A northern Indiana orthopedic surgeon has lost his appeal in a medical negligence case brought by a patient who continued to experience pain in his hand following a finger amputation.
A bank has failed to prove that one of its customers is thousands of dollars behind on her credit card payments, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled Thursday.
A man convicted of sexually exploiting a minor couldn’t convince the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals Wednesday that an enhancement to his sentence was not triggered by his prior state convictions for possession of child pornography.
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Alejandro Yeatts v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
19-1269
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. Magistrate Judge Michael Gotsch, Sr.
Civil. Affirms the Northern District Court’s denial of Alejandro Yeatts’ motion for partial summary judgment against Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. Finds statements provided by Biomet that Yeatts was suspended in connection with a corruption investigation against Biomet is not actionable defamation. Also finds Yeatts’ inability to prove the statement false demonstrates that it is a statement of opinion, beyond the reach of defamation law.
A teenager now under the wardship of the Indiana Department of Correction lost arguments Wednesday that the decision to declare him a ward of the DOC was an abuse of discretion.
The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed judgment awarded to a bank against a former homeowner who filed for bankruptcy, finding that because the man had been discharged of any liability on the mortgage, the judgment was in error.
A former Biomet employee has lost his argument before the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals that he was defamed by his former employer when it included his name in a list for the Department of Justice as part of a corruption investigation.
Indiana Supreme Court
Rodney W. Falls v. State of Indiana
19S-CR-557
Criminal. Grants transfer to reaffirm that a charge of stalking may be supported by conduct that is continuous in nature, even if it is a single episode. Finds that Rodney Falls’ conduct of following a college student by vehicle for more than two hours met the statutory definition of “continuing” harassment, thereby supporting his conviction in Kosciusko Superior Court of Level 6 felony stalking. Affirms the Indiana Court of Appeals’ opinion in all other respects.
A man’s act of following a college student for more than two hours on U.S. Highway 30 from Valparaiso to Warsaw constituted stalking, Indiana Supreme Court justices affirmed Tuesday, finding his actions were continuous in nature.
The Indiana Court of Appeals on Tuesday rejected multiple arguments regarding its prior decision involving the LaPorte County auditor’s failure to check records that would have revealed the address of a Michigan City property owner whose land was sold without notice for back taxes.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Pink A. Robinson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
18A-CR-2218
Criminal. Affirms Pink Robinson’s aggregate 48-year sentence for conviction in Elkhart Circuit Court of three counts of Level 3 felony robbery with a deadly weapon. Finds his sentence is not inappropriate in light of his character.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Jimmy E. Crase v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
18A-CR-2423
Criminal. Affirms Jimmy E. Crase’s conviction of two counts of Class B felony child molestation. Finds there is sufficient to support Crase’s classification as a credit restricted felon.
An employer who failed confirm its presence at a telephonic hearing it was scheduled to have with a recently terminated employee couldn’t convince the Indiana Court of Appeals that it was denied a reasonable opportunity for a fair hearing.
A man’s conviction in a domestic battery case after both defense and prosecution asked for a mistrial because a relative of the defendant communicated with a juror outside court will stand after the Indiana Supreme Court in a 3-2 decision chose not to hear the appeal. Chief Justice Loretta Rush and Justice Steven David published a dissent, believing the defendant had been prejudiced and was entitled to a new trial.
The denial of an Indianapolis property owner’s request to put a Dollar Tree in a vacant drugstore building was an abuse of discretion, the Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed in a Friday decision.
A wrongful death case will proceed to retrial after the Indiana Court of Appeals reversed the denial of a woman’s motion to strike a potential juror who expressed an unwillingness to decide the question of damages.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Bart M. Betteau v. Robert Headrick and Karen Headrick (mem. dec.)
18A-MI-2610
Miscellaneous. Affirms the Floyd Superior Court’s ruling that Robert and Karen Headrick are owners of an easement allowing use of a gravel driveway that runs across Bart Betteau’s property. Finds the Headricks have a right to use the gravel driveway along the path it followed at the time the Headricks and Betteau took title to their respective properties. Also finds the trial court did not err in assessing the Headricks and Betteau each half the maintenance cost for the portion of the gravel driveway that is utilized by both parties.
A man who stalked and kidnapped two women at gunpoint and led police on a vehicle chase couldn’t persuade the Indiana Court of Appeals to reduce his aggregate 75-year sentence.
Indiana Court of Appeals
James A. Ringley v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc. (mem. dec.)
19A-MF-782
Mortgage foreclosure. Affirms the Hamilton Superior Court’s order denying James Ringley’s motion to set aside the judgment entered in favor of Caliber Home Loans, Inc. Finds the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Ringley’s motion to set aside the judgment in favor of Caliber.