Trump and DOJ ask Supreme Court to toss $83M defamation verdict in E. Jean Carroll case
The Justice Department wants to invoke the Westfall Act, which shields government employees from being sued for doing their jobs.
The Justice Department wants to invoke the Westfall Act, which shields government employees from being sued for doing their jobs.
The Supreme Court appeal is part of a push by President Donald Trump and his allies to put fresh limits on voting ahead of the pivotal elections where control of both the House and the Senate is at stake.
Kagan told an audience of lawyers and judges that at significant times, on some big issues, “the court has checked the executive branch.”
Challenger Paula Copenhaver’s attorneys want the commission to issue subpoenas to compel testimony from perhaps 11 voters.
The federal agencies made the admission about the keywords in signed stipulations filed in federal court last week in a case that’s been ongoing since last spring.
The panel’s 2-1 ruling late Monday found there is a “substantial” public interest in disclosing the material that Biden wants to keep under wraps.
Lawyers for President Donald Trump and his sprawling business interests are heading to court this week in Florida for high-stakes hearings that follow a pair of major setbacks in their wave of multibillion-dollar lawsuits.
Blanche faced questioning about the creation of a fund to compensate President Donald Trump’s allies and a tax immunity deal for the president.
The scathing decision referred one of President Trump’s lawyers for potential disciplinary action and characterized the $10 billion complaint as an exercise in self-dealing.
The judge found that a law giving Gov. Mike Braun full control of Indiana University’s Board of Trustee membership is constitutional, ruling against a would-be candidate who alleged it was unjust special legislation.
The money was set aside after a jury found three years ago that President Donald Trump sexually abused Carroll in 1996 before he became president and defamed her after she publicly revealed the attack.
The conservative majority says the series of decisions helps correct an election system that has run afoul of the Constitution.
Legal experts said President Trump’s wins and losses at the Supreme Court reflect a divide in conservative ideology.
The 6-3 decision upends congressionally enacted limits on raising and spending money to influence elections.
More than one-quarter of a million babies born in the U.S. each year would have been affected by the executive order.
In an close ruling, the justices turned aside a challenge by Republicans and Libertarians, who argued federal law preempts a statute that allows the counting of such ballots that arrive up to five days after polls close.
The assertion — challenging a longstanding concept in American law — comes amid a raft of recommendations in a draft report of the Religious Liberty Commission, released Friday afternoon.
The decision is a major legal setback for President Donald Trump in his efforts to use federal agencies for a nationwide crackdown on noncitizens on state voter rolls.
Justices are preparing to rule on three signature President Trump initiatives: limiting birthright citizenship, firing the heads of independent agencies and reshaping the Federal Reserve.
The state declared execution unconstitutional in 1972, but reinstated capital punishment in 1981 under a law co-written by DeWine.