Articles

Opinions Oct. 17, 2014 ILD

Indiana Court of Appeals
Dominic Johnson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1403-CR-125
Criminal. Affirms convictions for auto theft, a Class C felony, and resisting law enforcement, a Class A felony.

Lamonte J. Moore v. State of Indiana (NFP)
4805-1403-CR-136
Criminal. Affirms 35-year sentence with 28 years executed and seven years suspended to probation for dealing in cocaine, a Class A felony; unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon, a Class B felony; maintaining a common nuisance, a Class D felony; and possession of marijuana, a Class A misdemeanor.

Anthony Peak Jr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
71A03-1406-CR-224
Criminal. Affirms 30-year sentence for pleading guilty to attempted robbery, a Class A felony.

Jeffrey Ray Shanks, Sr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A04-1406-CR-262
Criminal. Affirms seven-year sentence for pleading guilty to child molesting, a Class C felony.

Tony P. Fitts v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A03-1403-CR-77
Criminal. Affirms six-year sentence for pleading guilty to carrying a handgun without a license, a Class C felony.

Daisy Fletcher v. State of Indiana (NFP)
48A02-1402-CR-129
Criminal. Affirms revocation of suspended sentence and placement on home detention. Trial court found Fletcher violated the condition of her probation and ordered her to serve the remainder of her eight-year sentence in the Indiana Department of Correction.

Thomas Boardman v. State of Indiana (NFP)
48A02-1401-CR-8
Criminal. Affirms convictions for two counts of dealing in methamphetamine, a Class B felony, and one count of possession of chemical reagents or precursors with intent to manufacture a controlled substance, a Class D felony.
 

Read More

Drug abuse symposium attracts 800

About 800 Indiana health professional, lawmakers, law-enforcement officials and others gathered in Indianapolis Friday for the beginning of a two-day symposium focused on combating prescription drug abuse.

Read More

Opinions Oct. 16, 2014 ILD

Indiana Court of Appeals
Crown Capital Solutions v. Miller Pipeline Corp. and Liberty Mutual (NFP)
82A04-1403-SC-101
Small claim. Affirms dismissal of Crown Capital Solution’s small claims action seeking $6,000 in damages to a car and allegation it was entitled to bring the action as the car owner’s assignee.

Paul A. Parsley v. State of Indiana (NFP)
21A01-1402-CR-69
Criminal. Affirms convictions and sentence for class A felony dealing in a controlled substance within 1,000 feet of a public park and Class B felony dealing in a controlled substance.

Mark Mikesell v. State of Indiana (NFP)
89A01-1402-CR-51
Criminal.  Affirm murder conviction and 57-year sentence.

Douglas W. Zehner v. Pamela S. Zehner (NFP) 
87A01-1401-DR-44
Domestic relation.  Affirms award of spousal maintenance and award of attorney fees to Pamela Zehner.

Marquise McCloud v. State of Indiana (NFP)
48A02-1312-CR-1056
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A felony possession of more than three grams of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a family housing complex and 33-year executed sentence.

Jeremiah J. Mosley v. State of Indiana (NFP)
52A02-1402-CR-135
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class B felony dealing in methamphetamine, Class D felony possession of precursors with intent to manufacture a controlled substance and Class D felony possession of methamphetamine.

Gary Marcum v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1403-CR-111
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor operating a vehicle while intoxicated.

 

Read More

Opinions Oct. 16, 2014

Indiana Supreme Court
Indiana State Ethics Commission, Office of Inspector General, and David Thomas, in his Official Capacity as Inspector General v. Patricia Sanchez
49S02-1402-PL-80
Civil plenary. Affirms State Ethics Commission’s decision that Sanchez’s conduct – keeping several items that were state property after she was fired from the Department of Workforce Development – ran afoul of an administrative rule and that she should be barred from future state executive branch employment. Double jeopardy does not bar the proceeding before the commission, the criminal court’s probable cause determination is not binding upon the commission, and there is substantial independent evidence to support the commission’s decision.

Read More