Opinions

Indiana Court of Appeals
Edward Koziski v. State of Indiana
20A-CR-1889
Criminal. Affirms and reverses in part Edward Koziski’s convictions of two counts of Level 1 felony child molesting and one count each of Level 5 felony criminal confinement and Level 5 felony kidnapping. Finds the test in Wadle v. State, 151 N.E.3d 227 (Ind. 2020) applies. Also finds that under Wadle, Koziski’s Level 1 felony convictions do not violate double jeopardy. Finally, finds Koziski’s Level 5 felony convictions do violate double jeopardy under Wadle, because confinement is an included offense of kidnapping. Remands with instructions to vacate Koziski’s conviction and sentence for Level 5 felony criminal confinement.

Indiana Court of Appeals
In Re: the Adoption of K.T.; J.J. and C.T. v. G.C. and C.B.
20A-AD-2102
Adoption. Affirms the order finding that mother C.T. and father J.J.’s consent to the adoption of their minor child, K.T., was not necessary. Finds the Fulton Circuit Court did not err as a matter of law when it considered whether C.T. and J.J.’s consents to the adoption were required despite an ongoing CHINS proceeding with K.T. Also finds the record supports the trial court’s findings that J.J.’s consent to the adoption is not required, and the court’s findings support its judgment dispensing with J.J.’s consent.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Sandra A. King and Danielle D. Benge v. Dan Dejanovic and Alice Dejanovic
20A-PL-2366
Civil plenary. Affirms the order for Sandra A. King and Danielle D. Benge to remove or reduce the size of their pole barn within 90 days. Finds that even though there are other violations of the covenants in the subdivision, they are on the “other” side of the subdivision and “not practically within sigh” of the property owned by Dan and Alice Dejanovic. Also finds the Dejanovics’ failure to object to the other violations does not deprive them of the right to enforce the covenant for a violation right next door that directly interferes with the use and enjoyment of their property.

The following 7^th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion was posted after IL deadline Wednesday:
David Jones v. Rodney Cummings, et al.
20-1898
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Senior Judge Sarah Evans Barker. Civil. Affirms the dismissal of David Jones’ complaint alleging Madison County prosecutors maliciously prosecuted him in violation of his due process rights. Finds that longstanding principles of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and prosecutorial immunity block him at the threshold.

Richard Jefferson Deibel v. Larry Hoeg, Aaron Hoeg, and Roger Steffen
20-3378
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Chief Judge Tanya Walton Pratt. Civil. Affirms the dismissal of Richard Jefferson Deibel’s suit contending his settlement with Larry Hoeg and Roger Steffen allowed him to retain his shares in his former company Hy-Pro Corp. Finds Deibel’s suit was untimely and is not saved by a continuing wrong.

7^th Circuit Court of Appeals

Jay R. Thompson v. Frank Vanihel
20-2571
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division. Judge James R. Sweeney II.

Civil. Affirms the dismissal of Jay Thompson’s petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Finds counsel’s alleged legal errors did not prejudice Thompson.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Jeromy D. Hurd v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
20A-CR-1671
Criminal. Reverses Jeromy D. Hurd’s conviction for theft but affirms his convictions for dealing in methamphetamine and dealing in marijuana. Finds the state provided insufficient evidence to support Hurd’s conviction of theft but provided sufficient evidence that Hurd possessed meth and marijuana. Also finds that any error in the admission of messages received by Hurd’s phone was harmless. Remands.

Indiana Court of Appeals
James L. Mosley v. State of Indiana
20A-CR-02094
Criminal. Reverses the Ripley Circuit Court’s revocation of three years of James L. Mosley’s probation for his conviction of fraud, as well as its order that he spend those years in prison. Finds a no-contact order cannot be issued to protect a dead person and that Mosley’s probation cannot be revoked based on violation of that void order.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Paul M. Robey v. State of Indiana
20A-CR-2187
Criminal. Affirms Paul M. Robey’s conviction of Class 4 felony child molesting. Finds the video of the victim’s forensic interview was merely cumulative of B.B.’s testimony, so any error in publishing it was harmless.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Donnie Louis Sawyer v. State of Indiana
20A-CR-1446
Criminal. Reverses the order denying Donnie Louis Sawyer’s petition for depositions of two minors alleged to be victims of child molesting by Sawyer. Finds Indiana Code § 35-40-5-11.5 conflicts with the Indiana Trial Rules 26 and 30, so the provisions of the Trial Rules govern.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Shawn Lacey v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
20A-CR-1689
Criminal. Affirms Shawn Lacey’s conviction of Level 5 felony battery. Finds the evidence is sufficient.

Express Scripts Incorporated v. Department of State Revenue
19T-TA-18
Tax. Denies the Indiana Department of State Revenue’s motion for partial summary judgment and grants summary judgment to Express Scripts on the issue of whether Express Scripts receives its Indiana income from the retail sale of prescription drugs or from the provision of services. Finds Express Scripts receives its Indiana income from the latter. Remands the matter to the department for action consistent with the opinion.

7^th Circuit Court of Appeals

USA v. Ethel Shelton
19-3388
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division. Senior Judge Joseph S. Van Bokkelen.

Criminal. Reverses and remands Ethel Shelton’s conviction for conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud. Finds that the district court erred when it found that Shelton lacked any reasonable expectation of privacy in her office. Finds Stafford Garbutt’s document collection violated Shelton’s Fourth Amendment rights. Finds the warrant would not have been issued in the absence of the information gathered as a result of the unlawful searches. Thus, the district court should have suppressed the evidence obtained from the search authorized by that warrant, and granted Shelton’s motion for a mistrial.

Soraida Flores v. City of South Bend
20-1603
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division. Judge James T. Moody.
Civil. Reverses the Northern Indiana District Court’s dismissal of Soraida Flores’s lawsuit against former South Bend police officer Justin Gorny and the City of South Bend as personal representative of deceased Erica Flores. Although the district court concluded Gorny did not violate the motorist’s constitutional rights, the 7^th Circuit finds that Flores’s allegations plausibly state claims against both defendants, and she is therefore entitled to proceed with her case. Remands for further proceedings. Circuit Judge Michael B. Brennan writes separately in concurrence.

The following 7^th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion was posted after IL deadline on Monday:
Katherine Black v. Cherie Wrigley
20-2656
Civil. Affirms a jury’s verdict against Katherine Black in her defamation dispute with Cherie Wrigley and denies her request for a new trial based on her assertions that the Northern District Court of Illinois erred in several ways. Finds no errors warrant a reversal of the jury’s verdict.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Karl Woodall v. State of Indiana
20A-CR-00862
Criminal. Affirms Karl Woodall’s murder conviction and the Marion Superior Court’s grant of the State of Indiana’s motion for a mistrial on grounds of jury taint. Finds Woodall was not subjected to procedural double jeopardy upon retrial. Finds the trial court did not commit fundamental error in instructing the jury or in conducting the sentencing hearing.

The following 7^th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion was posted after IL deadline Thursday:
United States of America v. Adonnis Carswell 
20-1036
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division. Judge Holly A. Brady.
Criminal. Affirms Adonnis Carswell’s convictions of four drug and firearm offenses, including possession of heroin with intent to distribute. Finds that the judge who issued the search warrant intended for Carswell’s home had a reasonable basis for thinking evidence of drug and firearm crimes was likely to be found there. Also finds the prosecution’s closing arguments were not improper, did not make Carswell’s trial unfair and did not deny him due process of law.  

Indiana Court of Appeals
Juventino V. Ramirez v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
20A-CR-1982
Criminal. Affirms Juventino V. Ramirez’s conviction of Level 4 felony child molesting. Finds the Allen Superior Court’s rulings on Ramirez’s discovery requests were not an abuse of discretion, nor did they violate his constitutional rights. Also finds the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Ramirez’s motion for a continuance, did not allow him to make an offer of proof of a recording of a forensic interview, allowed a witness to give vouching testimony or in instructing the jury. Finally, finds that even if the trial court abused its discretion in allowing vouching testimony or hearsay, the error was harmless.

The following Indiana Supreme Court opinion was posted after IL deadline Tuesday:
Zachariah Brian Wright v. State of Indiana
20S-LW-260
Life without parole. Affirms the denial of Zachariah Brian Wright’s request to self-represent, and his sentence of life without the possibility of parole plus 18 years for his convictions of murder, Level 3 felony criminal confinement, Level 6 felony theft, Level 5 felony burglary and Level 2 felony attempted burglary. Finds that Wright’s waiver of the right to counsel was knowing and voluntary, but because his waiver was neither unequivocal nor intelligent, the Boone Superior Court properly denied his request. Also finds Wright’s sentence was not inappropriate in light of the nature of his offenses or his character. Remands for the correction of a minor oversight in the sentencing order. Justice Mark Massa concurs in result with separate opinion. Justice Geoffrey Slaughter dissents with separate opinion.