Opinions

Indiana Court of Appeals
Scott D. Hartman v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
20A-CR-422
Criminal. Affirms Scott D. Hartman’s convictions of Level 4 felony unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon and Class A misdemeanor operating a motor vehicle while privileges are suspended. Finds the Delaware Circuit Court did not violate Hartman’s speedy-trial request when it granted the state’s motion to continue under Criminal Rule 4(D). Also finds Hartman has waived his appellate challenges to the admission of evidence and to the limiting of his cross-examination of his passenger at the time of his crimes.

The following Indiana Supreme Court opinion was issued after IL deadline Thursday:
G&G Oil Co. of Indiana, Inc. v. Continental Western Insurance Co.
20S-PL-617
Civil plenary. Reverses the Marion Superior Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Continental Western Insurance Company but affirms the denial of G&G Oil Company of Indiana’s motion for summary judgment in a dispute over coverage of a ransomware attack. Finds that although G&G Oil’s losses resulted directly from the use of a computer, neither party is entitled to summary judgment. Remands for further proceedings.

The following 7^th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion was posted after IL deadline Wednesday:
Jeffery Bridges v. United States of America
20-1623
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Judge Tanya Walton Pratt.
Civil. Reverses the denial of Jeffery Bridges’ petition for habeas relief. Finds that in this case, counsel’s failure to raise an important and meritorious sentencing guideline argument may constitute ineffective assistance of counsel. Also finds that Hobbs Act robbery is not a “crime of violence” as the phrase is defined in the sentencing guidelines. Remands with orders including an evidentiary hearing on defense counsel’s performance under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(b).

The following opinions were posted after IL deadline Tuesday:
7^th Circuit Court of Appeals
United States of America v. Korrtel Filzen
20-1071
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Judge Richard L. Young.
Criminal. Affirms the $1,100 special assessment imposed on Korrtel Filzen for his convictions of 11 felony offenses related to an armed robbery spree. Finds the district court could not have lawfully imposed the $900 special assessment considered in Filzen’s plea agreement, and the lawful sentence that it did impose did not seriously affect the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings. Also finds that the court’s Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 violation was not reversible error.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Jeffery Gene Garrison v. Mark Sevier, et al.
20A-MI-01087
Miscellaneous. Affirms the Henry Circuit Court’s denial of Jeffrey Gene Garrison’s request for immediate release from the Department of Correction after his parole was revoked, finding Garrison’s claims are either meritless or waived.

The following 7th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion was posted after IL deadline Friday.

Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. v. Kristina Box

17-2428

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Senior Judge Sarah Evans Barker.

Civil. Affirms on remand from the United States Supreme Court the district court injunction against enforcement of Senate Enrolled Act 404 (2017), which restricted minors’ access to abortion. Holds that binding standards of caselaw from Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, 136 S. Ct. 2292 (2016), has not been overruled by a majority opinion of the Supreme Court, leading the majority to affirm the district court preliminary injunction barring full review in the district court. Judge Michael Kanne dissents with opinion.

The following 7th Circuit Court of Appeals opinions were posted after IL deadline Thursday:
USA v. Rita Law
19-2345
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division. Judge Joseph S. Van Bokkelen.
Criminal. Affirms Rita Law’s conviction of four sex trafficking-related counts and 360-month sentence, finding no errors by the district court in the admission or sufficiency of the evidence or the imposition of sentence.

The following 7^th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion was posted after IL Deadline Wednesday:
Kevin Pack v. Middlebury Community Schools
20-1912
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. Judge Damon R. Leichty.
Civil. Affirms summary judgment for Middlebury Community Schools in fired teacher Kevin Pack’s lawsuit alleging the schools violated a confidentiality agreement entered into to settle his prior suit over his termination. Finds that even accepting the facts in the light most favorable to Pack, MCS in entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

The following 7^th Circuit Court of Appeals opinions were posted after IL deadline Tuesday:
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc., et al. v. Eric Holcomb, Governor of Indiana, et al.
20-1445
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Judge Richard L. Young.
Civil. Affirms the dismissal of a complaint brought by owner-operators of heavy trucks challenging the increase in tolls on the Indiana Toll Road, finding the toll increase was not discriminatory in violation of the Commerce Clause.

Indiana Court of Appeals
John A. Huntzinger v. Champion Lake Ski Club, Inc., and Bryan Burney
20A-PL-1653
Civil plenary. Affirms the grant of summary judgment in favor of Champion Lake Ski Club Inc. and Bryan Burney on John Huntzinger’s claim for breach of settlement and intentional interference with contractual relationship. Finds the Hancock Superior Court did not err.

The following 7^th Circuit Court of Appeals opinions were posted after IL deadline Friday:
P.W., a minor, by Dominque Woodson, his mother and guardian, et al. v. United States of America
20-1142
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division. Senior Judge Theresa L. Springmann.
Civil. Affirms the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the United States on the Federal Tort Claims Act action brought by Dominque Woodson on behalf of her son, P.W. Finds the plaintiffs’ claims were untimely, and they do not satisfy the second element of the savings provision of the Westfall Act. Also finds the plaintiffs’ claims do not qualify for equitable estoppel or equitable tolling. Judge David Hamilton dissents with separate opinion.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Christopher M. Hubbert v. State of Indiana
20A-CR-1617
Criminal. Reverses Christopher M. Hubbert’s 18-year executed sentence for his conviction of Level 2 felony dealing in methamphetamine. Finds Hubbert’s sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and his character. Remands to the Bartholomew Superior Court to impose a sentence of 18 years, with four years executed in the Indiana Department of Correction and the remaining years served on probation with substance abuse counseling and placement in community corrections.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Benjamen P. Chastain v. State of Indiana
20A-CR-1553
Criminal. Affirms Benjamen Chastain’s sentence to the maximum 23 years, all executed in the Department of Correction, for his conviction of Class B felony child molesting. Finds the Orange Circuit Court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Chastain, and his sentence is not inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and Chastain’s character.

The following Indiana Supreme Court opinion was posted after IL deadline Tuesday:
In the Matter of the Adoption of I.B. (Minor Child): J.P. v. V.B.
21S-AD-90
Adoption. Affirms the Hamilton Superior Court’s ruling that biological mother J.P.’s consent was not required for the adoption of her child I.B. because, for a period of one year, she failed to communicate significantly with her child and failed to support her child when able and required to do so. Finds the trial court’s determinations were supported by sufficient evidence.

Indiana Court of Appeals 

Christopher Johnston v. State of Indiana

20A-PC-1135

Post conviction. Affirms the denial of Christopher Johnston’s petition for post-conviction relief. Finds Johnston received the effective assistance of his trial and appellate counsel. Judge Terry Crone concurs in result without separate opinion.

Indiana Court of Appeals 

In Re the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of: A.L. (Minor Child) and A.N. (Mother) v. Indiana Department of Child Services (mem. dec.); In Re the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of: G.L. (Minor Child) and A.N. (Mother) v. Indiana Department of Child Services; In Re the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of: R.L. (Minor Child) and A.N. (Mother) v. Indiana Department of Child Services
20A-JT-1631; 20A-JT-1633; 20A-JT-1639

Juvenile termination of parental rights. Affirms the termination of mother A.N.’s parental rights to her three children, A.L., G.L. and R.L. Finds A.N. has waived her challenge to the admission of Petitioner’s Exhibit 1 by failing to provide a cogent argument, and even if there were a discovery violation, the Jay Circuit Court did not abuse its discretion. Also finds A.N. has waived her argument that the Indiana Department of Child Services violated her due process rights because she failed to object on due process grounds in the trial court and she failed to specific any constitutional basis for her due process claim; waiver notwithstanding, her due process argument fails on the merits because she did not establish a risk of error arising from DCS’ actions. Finally, finds there is sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s termination judgment.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Heather Harvey v. Keyed In Property Management, LLC
20A-SC-01459

Small claims. Affirms the Brown Circuit Court’s damages award of $1,500 plus $125 in court costs in favor of Keyed In Property Management, finding that it was entitled to the maximum award for an LLC not represented by legal counsel under Indiana Small Claims Rule 8(C). Rejects Heather Harvey’s argument on appeal that the award was excessive and that she had been subject to constructive eviction.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Carl Z. Swallow v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
20A-CR-1825
Criminal. Affirms the revocation of Carl Z. Swallow’s probation and the order for him to serve the entirety of his suspended two-year sentence in the Indiana Department of Correction. Finds the Delaware Circuit Court’s sanction was not an abuse of discretion. Also finds Johnson v. State, 62 N.E.3d 1224, 1229 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016), does not compel a different result in this case.

The following 7^th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion was posted after IL deadline Tuesday:
Jennifer L. Karr v. Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
20-1939
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division. Judge Philip P. Simon.
Civil. Affirms the district court’s decision upholding an administrative law judge’s determination that Jennifer Karr was not disabled because she still could perform sedentary work with some restrictions. Finds the ALJ’s decision was supported by substantial evidence.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Andrew Conley v. State of Indiana
19A-PC-3085
Post conviction. Affirms and reverses in part Andrew Conley’s amended petition for post-conviction relief. Finds Conley’s trial counsel failed to adequately present mitigating evidence, missed opportunities to present expert testimony on scientific evidence regarding the juvenile brain, and missed opportunities to zealously present evidence and challenge the state’s evidence regarding Conley’s mental health. Also finds Conley has shown that his trial counsel’s performance fell well short of prevailing profession norms, and his trial counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced his defense to the extent there is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome. Finally, finds the post-conviction court’s denial of Conley’s ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim is clearly erroneous, but the court’s denial of the remainder of Conley’s claims is not clearly erroneous. Remands to the Ohio Circuit Court for a new sentencing hearing.