Opinions

Indiana Court of Appeals
In the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of: S.S. (Minor Child) and L.M. (Mother) and Sa.S. (Father) v. The Indiana Department of Child Services
18A-JT-2370
Juvenile Termination. Affirms the termination of L.M. and Sa.S.’s parental rights to their child, S.S. Finds the White Circuit Court did not err in terminating either mother or father’s parental rights. Finds the juvenile court did not err in its determination of S.S.’s best interests.

Indiana Supreme Court 
Angelo Bobadilla v. State of Indiana
19S-PC-128
Post-conviction. Reverses the denial of deported immigrant Angelo Bobadilla’s petition for post-conviction relief alleging his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to properly advise him of the immigration consequences of a misdemeanor guilty plea. Finds Bobadilla’s trial counsel was ineffective, and Bobadilla was prejudiced by his counsel’s performance. Also finds the record shows a reasonable probability that had Bobadilla known the full immigration consequences of his plea agreement, he would have rejected the plea bargain and instead insisted on going to trial. Remands for further proceedings. Justice Mark Massa dissents with separate opinion joined by Justice Geoffrey Slaughter. 

Indiana Court of Appeals
FMS Nephrology Partners North Central Indiana Dialysis Centers, LLC v. Meritain Health, Inc., et al.
18A-PL-1349
Civil plenary. Affirms the St. Joseph Superior Court’s award of summary judgement in favor of Meritain Health, Inc., Beacon Health System, Inc., Beacon Health System Group Benefit Plan, Beacon Health System Group Benefit Plan – Union Plan, University of Notre Dame Du Lac, University of Notre Dame CHA HMO Plan (Medical), University of Notre Dame Select HMO Plan (Medical), and University of Notre Dame PPO Plan (Medical). Finds breach of contract and promissory estoppel claims presented by FMS Nephrology Partners North Central Indiana Dialysis Centers, LLC, are pre-empted under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Concludes summary judgment was properly awarded to the Beacon Health and Notre Dame plans.

The following 7th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion was posted after IL deadline Thursday.
David Jones v. Dushan Zatecky
17-2606
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Judge Richard L. Young.
Civil. Vacates the district court’s denial of David Jones’ petition for writ of habeus corpus. Finds Jones is entitled to the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, based on his attorney’s failure to object to an untimely amendment to his conviction for criminal confinement. Remands with instructions to issue the writ within 120 days with respect the criminal confinement conviction and to make any necessary adjustments to Jones’ sentence on the two unchallenged counts of conviction. Circuit Judge Manion dissents in a separate opinion.

The following Indiana Supreme Court opinions were posted after IL deadline Wednesday.
Zachariah J. Marshall v. State of Indiana
18S-CR-464
Criminal. Affirms the Porter Superior Court’s denial of Zachariah Marshall’s motion to suppress evidence from his traffic stop for speeding. Finds there are sufficient articulable facts to give an officer reasonable suspicion that Marshall was speeding. Finds the traffic stop was reasonable in view of the totality of the circumstances.

7th Circuit Court of Appeals
The following opinion was posted after IL deadline Tuesday.
Leroy Washington v. Marion County Prosecutor
17-2933
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Chief Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson.
Civil. Denies the Marion County prosecutor’s motion to dismiss Leroy Washington’s civil forfeiture appeal as moot following statuary amendments made to Indiana’s vehicle forfeiture statute. Finds the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana was not given the chance to address the amendments. Remands to the district court to address Washington and the prosecutor’s contentions regarding the amendments.

Indiana Court of Appeals
In re the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of A.M. (Minor Child) and B.S. (Mother) B.S. (Mother) v. Indiana Department of Child Services (mem. dec.)
18A-JT-1877
Juvenile termination of parental rights. Affirms the termination of mother B.S.’s parental rights to her daughter A.M., finding that the Jasper Circuit Court did not err when it concluded that termination is in the child’s best interests.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Kamion D. Melton v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
18A-CR-1142
Criminal. Affirms Kamion Melton’s conviction of Level 5 felony carrying a handgun without a license. Affirms the Vanderburgh Circuit Court did not err by admitting into evidence a Snapchat video that shows Melton displaying the gun on his person.

Indiana Court of Appeals 
Meghan E. Price v. State of Indiana
18A-CR-1513
Criminal. Affirms Meghan Price’s conviction for Level 1 felony neglect of a dependent resulting in death. Finds the Morgan Circuit Court did not abuse its discretion by admitting evidence procured from a warrantless search of Price’s home. Also finds the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting evidence obtained from Price’s cellphone. 

Indiana Court of Appeals 
Ryan A. Benefiel v. Junko M. Stalker
18A-JP-2078
Juvenile paternity. Affirms the Hamilton Circuit Court’s order that Ryan Benefiel pay $20,000 in attorney’s fees incurred by Junko Makiah Stalker during their paternity action. Finds Benefiel’s behavior caused additional attorney fees to be incurred by Stalker. Also finds the parties’ economic conditions support an award of attorney’s fees. 

Indiana Court of Appeals
Jonathon Barthalow v. State of Indiana
18A-CR-1366
Criminal. Affirms Jonathon Barthalow’s conviction of Level 3 felony burglary. Finds there is sufficient evidence to support Barthalow’s conviction. Finds the Wayne Circuit Court did not commit fundamental error in failing to provide the jury with the definition of bodily injury.

Indiana Court of Appeals 
Darlene Perkins v. Kathy Fillio
18A-PL-2278
Civil plenary. Reverses and remands the Washington Circuit Court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Kathy Fillio and against Darlene Perkins. Finds the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Fillio on Perkins’s premises liability claim due to the existence of genuine issues of material fact. Also finds Perkins did not designate evidence sufficient to generate a genuine issue of material fact as to negligent entrustment or negligent supervision, nor did she preserve her claim of vicarious liability for appellate review.

Indiana Court of Appeals
In the Matter of the Parent-Child Relationship of Ma.H., Le.H., Lo.H., W.H., La.H., Me.H., and S.W. (Children) and M.H. (Father) and R.H. (Mother); et al. v. The Indiana Department of Child Services
18A-JT-1296
Juvenile termination of parental rights. Reverses and remands the Wells Circuit Court’s termination of M.H. and R.H.’s parental rights to their seven children. Finds the trial court’s requirement that M.H. admit to sexually abusing stepdaughter R.W. as part of sex offender treatment violated his Fifth Amendment rights. Remands for reinstatement of the CHINS cases, a re-examination of the requirements for reunification and a revised dispositional order outlining the services consistent with the holdings in the opinion that M.H. and R.H. must complete to reunify with the children. Judge Margret Robb dissents with separate opinion. 

The following 7th Circuit Court opinions were posted after IL deadline Thursday.
ARC Welding Supply, Co. Inc. v. American Welding & Gas, Inc.
18-1546
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Evansville Division. Judge Richard L. Young.
Civil. Affirms the Southern District Court’s entry of judgment in favor of American Welding & Gas Inc. and the award of damages in the amount of $33,765.52, plus interest. Finds the court did not err in basing its damage award on a $125 cylinder valuation. Also finds American’s agreement with ARC Welding Supply Co. does not contain language that would require its audit to be completed within 180 days, nor that $150,000 be owed to ARC if American fails to complete the audit by that deadline.

The following 7th Circuit Court opinion was posted after IL deadline Wednesday.
Red Barn Motors, Inc. v. NextGear Capital, Inc.
18-1409
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Judge Tanya Walton Pratt.
Civil. Vacates the Southern District Court’s decision to rescind class certification for Red Barns Motors’ numerous claims against NextGear Capital, including breach of contract, constructive fraud and RICO violations and conspiracy. Finds the district court’s denial of the class certification lacks sufficient reasoning and explanation. Remands for further proceedings.

Indiana Court of Appeals
State of Indiana v. D.R.
18A-JV-1608
Juvenile. Affirms the Vigo Circuit Court’s denial of the state’s motion to waive D.R. to adult court on an allegation that he committed what would be Level 5 felony reckless homicide if committed by an adult. The trial court’s determination that D.R. overcame the presumption of waiver is not against the facts and circumstances of the case. Denies D.R.’s motion to dismiss the state’s interlocutory appeal, finding the state was permitted to appeal the denial of waiver under the circumstance of the case.

7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Danny Ray v. Nancy Berryhill
18-2229
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman.
Civil. Vacates the denial of supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits to Danny Ray, finding an administrative law judge erroneously discredited Ray, failed to treat his prior job as “composite,” and improperly assessed his functional abilities compared to the job requirements for a bus monitor in the general economy. Remands to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana with instructions to remand the case to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings.

The following 7th Circuit Court opinion was posted after IL deadline Friday.
Ronnie L. Winsted, Jr. v. Nancy A. Berryhill
18‐2228
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division. Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore.
Civil. Remands the denial of Ronnie Winsted’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Finds the administrative law judge did not consider Winsted’s difficulties with concentration, persistence, and pace. Finds the ALJ did not adequately explain how the limitations he placed on Winsted’s residual functional capacity accounted for his concentration-functioning difficulties. Remands to the Social Security Administration.

Indiana Court of Appeals 
Bryan Alexander, Karl Cameron, William Love, Charlie Lovins, Kevin McMurray and Matt Oelker, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Linkmeyer Development II, LLC, et al.
18A-PL-311
Civil plenary. Affirms the denial of a motion for summary judgment brought by a class of laborers formerly employed by Linkmeyer Development II, LLC and its members Steve Linkmeyer and Brian Bischoff and the partial grant of summary judgment to Linkmeyer Development, Linkmeyer and Bischoff on an unjust enrichment claim. Also affirms the partial denial of Linkmeyer Development, Linkmeyer and Bischoff’s summary judgment motion on claims brought under Indiana wage laws. Finds the Dearborn Circuit Court did not err. Judge John Baker concurs in part and dissents in part with separate opinion

Indiana Court of Appeals 
Rickey D. Haines v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
18A-CR-2113
Criminal. Affirms Rickey Haines’ 14-year sentence for Level 3 felony criminal confinement. Finds the Brown Circuit Court did not abuse its discretion in resentencing Haines by considering convictions he obtained after his original sentencing. Also finds that because Haines invited any alleged error by arguing the court could consider his testimony about his behavior while incarcerated between his first and second sentencing hearings, he cannot raise the alleged error on appeal.