Indiana Court of Appeals
J.S. v. State of Indiana
18A-JV-1049
Juvenile. Affirms the placement of J.S. in the Indiana Department of Correction following his admission to delinquent acts that would have amounted to Level 6 felony receiving stolen auto parts, Class A misdemeanor dangerous possession of a firearm and Class A misdemeanor theft if committed by an adult. Finds the Marion Superior Court did not abuse its discretion.
Indiana Supreme Court
B.T.E. v. State of Indiana
36S05-1711-JV-711
Juvenile. Affirms the Jackson Superior Court’s adjudication of B.T.E. as a juvenile delinquent for what would have been Level 3 felony attempted aggravated battery if committed by an adult. Finds there is sufficient evidence B.T.E took a substantial step toward a plot to shoot up and blow up Seymour High School.
Indiana Court of Appeals
In the Matter of: T.T. and M.M., Children in Need of Services: C.Y. (Mother) v. The Indiana Department of Child Services
18A-JC-1216
Juvenile CHINS. Reverses the Tippecanoe Superior Court’s denial of C.Y.’s motion to dismiss CHINS petitions filed by the Indiana Department of Child Services in regard to her two children, T.T. and M.M. Finds the fact-finding hearing was not completed within 120 days of the filing of the CHINS petitions. Notes that Indiana Code section 31-34-11-1 creates “a hard and fast deadline” for filing completion. Remands with instructions to dismiss the CHINS petitions without prejudice.
Indiana Court of Appeals
James Wade Baker, Jr. v. State of Indiana
30A01-1710-CR-2511
Criminal. Affirms James Baker’s conviction of Level 6 felony resisting law enforcement by use of a vehicle and Class A misdemeanor driving while suspended with a prior similar offense within the past 10 years. Finds the Hancock Superior Court erred in admitting hearsay evidence from Deputy Kevin Stickford but noted the hearsay evidence was harmless and did not contribute to the jury’s verdict. Also finds the state erred when it asked Baker a question before reading him his Miranda rights. Finds there is sufficient evidence to support the conviction based on eyewitness testimony.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Umesh Kaushal v. State of Indiana
49A04-1612-CR-2862
Criminal. Affirms the Marion Superior Court’s denial of Umesh Kaushal’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea for Level 4 felony child molesting. Finds Kaushal did not establish that he was prejudiced by his counsel’s performance in light of Jae Lee v. United States. Also finds Kaushal did not establish a reasonable probability that he would not have pled guilty and would have insisted on going to trial if not for his counsel’s errors.
The following 7th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion was posted after IL deadline Wednesday.
Jane Doe v. Vigo County, et al.
17-3155
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division. Judge William T. Lawrence.
Civil tort. Affirms summary judgment in favor of Vigo County on a civil liability suit filed after Jane Doe was sexually assaulted by a county parks department maintenance worker. Finds Doe has not proven that Vigo County had reason to believe the assault was foreseeable, and there was not enough evidence to support a Monell claim.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Bobby J. Johnson, Jr. v. Hix Wrecker Service, Inc.
18A-PL-10
Civil plenary. Affirms the Marion Superior Court’s award of post-judgment attorney’s fees to Bobby J. Johnson, Jr. and his counsel. Finds the trial court did not abuse its discretion by vacating its prior provisional order for sanctions against Hix Wrecker Service, Inc. Also finds no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s calculation and award of roughly $35,000 in post-judgement attorney fees to Johnson’s counsel without using the lodestar method.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Jason Michael Gibson v. State of Indiana
18A-CR-743
Criminal. Affirms Jason Michael Gibson’s convictions of robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery, both as Level 3 felonies and his sentence to an aggregate of 17 years. Finds the St. Joseph Superior Court did not commit fundamental error when it entered judgment of conviction for conspiracy to commit robbery, and his convictions do not violate double jeopardy principles. Also finds the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it admitted into evidence Gibson’s inculpatory statements to police and the evidence was sufficient to support Gibson’s conspiracy conviction. Finally, finds Gibson failed to show that the trial court abused its discretion when it sentenced him.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Joseph Baliga, DVM v. Indiana Horse Racing Commission, Indiana Horse Racing Commission Staff
17A-MI-3009
Miscellaneous. Reverses the Madison Circuit Court’s dismissal of veterinarian Joseph Baliga’s petition for judicial review after the Indiana Horse Racing Commission found him in default for allegedly giving a banned substance to a racehorse. Finds the IHRC and administrative law judge abused their discretion by finding Baliga in default. Directs the trial court to grant the petition and to remand the matter to the IHRC for a hearing on the merits.
Indiana Court of Appeals
International Business Machines Corporation v. State of Indiana, acting on behalf of the Indiana Family & Social Services Administration
49A02-1709-PL-2006
Civil plenary. Affirms and reverses in part the Marion Superior Court’s calculation of damages stemming from IBM Corp.’s material breach of a master services agreement with the State of Indiana. Finds the trial court did not err in its award of the state’s damages. Also finds IBM is entitled to post-judgment interest on its $49.5 million damages award. Remands for recalculation of the post-judgment interest.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Rainbow Realty Group, Inc., and/or Cress Trust v. Katrina Carter and Quentin Lintner,
49A02-1707-CC-1473.
Civil collections. Reverses the Marion Superior Court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Katrina Carter and Quentin Lintner. Reverses the award to them of $4,000 in damages and $3,000 in attorney fees. Remands with instructions to enter summary judgment for Rainbow Realty. Finds Rainbow’s rent-to-buy agreement was not a lease; that Rainbow had not committed fraud as a matter of law; and that because Carter and Lintner did not prevail, they are not entitled to legal fees.
The following Indiana Tax Court decision was issued Monday.
Garrett LLC v. Noble County Assessor
49T10-1712-TA-22
Tax. Affirms the Indiana Board of Tax Review’s determination of Garrett LLC’s assessed value of its real property for the 2016 tax year. Finds Garrett failed to present sufficient evidence to support its claims on appeal.
Indiana Supreme Court
State of Indiana v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
18S-IF-193
Infraction. Finds Indiana’s blocked-crossing statute which prevents trains from blocking intersections for more than 10 minutes is pre-empted by the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act. Holds that Indiana’s statute, Ind. Code section 8-6-7.5-1, violates the ICCTA’s prohibition on managing or governing rail transportation by causing Norfolk Southern to change several key operations just to try to comply.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Delmar Kelly v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
18A-CR-1162
Criminal. Affirms Delmar Kelly’s dealing in narcotics conviction. Finds the Hendricks Superior Court did not commit fundamental error in allowing the state to present during trial evidence of Kelly’s post-arrest, pre-Miranda silence. Also finds Kelly’s due process rights were not violated.
Indiana Court of Appeals
GO Properties, LLC, and Maxim Alliance Group, LLC v. BER Enterprises, LLC; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for Franklin American Mortgage Company; New Field, LLC; et al.
18A-PL-176
Civil plenary. Reverses the Marion Superior Court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of BER Enterprises, LLC and New Field, LLC on GO Properties’ quiet title action. Finds the trial court erred and that Stacy Phillips did not have actual or apparent authority to sell the properties on behalf of GO Properties. Remands with instructions to enter summary judgment in favor of GO Properties.
Nicholas R. Hedrick v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
18A-CR-762
Criminal. Affirms Nicholas R. Hedrick’s 12-year sentence for conviction of Class C felony and Level 4 felony counts of child molesting pursuant to a plea agreement. The Pike Circuit Court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing nor was the sentence inappropriate in light of the nature of the offenses or Hedrick’s character.
Indiana Court of Appeals
C.S., Jr. v. State of Indiana
18A-JV-862
Juvenile. Affirms the Elkhart Juvenile Court’s placement of C.S., Jr., in the Indiana Department of Correction after his delinquency adjudication for what would have been Class A misdemeanor dangerous possession of a firearm if committed by an adult. The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion and C.S., Jr.’s presence via video conference was sufficient to satisfy the requirements of Indiana Code section 31-37-18-1.3.
Indiana Court of Appeals
K.M. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
18A-JV-643
Juvenile. Affirms K.M.’s conviction of Level 4 felony child molesting if committed by an adult. Finds sufficient evidence to support the conviction.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Timothy C. Troxel v. Dale Ward, successor in interest to original Plaintiff, Plan Administrators, Inc.
18A-PL-597
Civil plenary. Reverses the LaPorte Circuit Court’s denial of Timothy Troxel’s Trial Rule 60(B) motion to set aside the sale of his stock in an Indiana corporation to satisfy default judgment against him by a Wisconsin corporation. Finds because Troxel was not properly served with notice of the Wisconsin lawsuit, the Wisconsin court did not have personal jurisdiction over him. Therefore, the Wisconsin judgment and any Indiana orders based upon it are void.
The following 7th Circuit Court opinion was posted after Indiana lawyer deadline Thursday.
Gregory Aregood, Jr. v. Givaudan Flavors Corporation
17-3390
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Judge Sarah Evans Barker.
Civil. Affirms and reverses in part, remands for proceedings. Affirms the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana’s grant of summary judgment to Givaudan Flavors Corp. on its employees’ claims, except for failure to warn. Reverses the grant of summary judgment on the employees’ duty to warn claim based on the sophisticated intermediary doctrine. Remands for proceedings on the duty to warn claim.