The Indiana Lawyer
  • Login
    [×]

    Forgot your password?

  • Subscribe
  • View Cart 0 items
  • News
    • In This Issue
      • Top Stories
      • Focus
      • Opinion
      • In Brief
      • Announcements
      • Indiana Lawyer Digital Newspaper
    • Law Firm
      • Big Law
      • Midsize Law
      • Solo and Small Firm
    • Courts
      • Indiana Court of Appeals
      • Indiana Supreme Court
      • Indiana Tax Court
      • State trial courts
      • 7th Circuit Court of Appeals
      • Supreme Court of the United States
      • District Courts
    • Pro bono/Legal aid
    • Law Schools
      • Indiana Tech Law School
      • Indiana University Maurer School of Law
      • Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law
      • University of Notre Dame Law School
      • Valparaiso University School of Law
    • Discipline
    • Government
      • General Assembly
      • State agencies
      • Federal agencies
    • Opinion
      • Indiana Lawyer Editorial
        • Letters to the Editor
    • Features
    • In-house/Corporate counsel
  • Bar Assocs.
    • Indianapolis Bar Association
    • Indiana State Bar Association
    • Defense Trial Counsel of Indiana
    • Indiana Trial Lawyers Association
    • More Bar Associations
      • Allen County Bar Association
      • Evansville Bar Association
      • Lake County Bar Association
      • Marion County Bar Association
      • St. Joseph County Bar Association
      • Other local bar associations
  • Corp. Counsel
    • Submit profile for Corporate Counsel Guide
    • Corporate Counsel Guide
  • People
    • Submit People
  • Opinions
  • Events
    • Indiana Lawyer Events
    • Leadership in Law
      • Leadership in Law Nominations
      • Leadership in Law Event Registration
      • 2025 Leadership in Law Winners
      • 2024 Leadership in Law Event Video
      • Past Recipients
    • Diversity in Law
      • Diversity in Law Nominations
      • Diversity in Law Event Registration
      • 2024 Diversity in Law Winners
  • Classifieds
    • Classifieds
    • Place an Ad
  • Newsletters
  • Content Studio
    • Thought Leadership
      • Mediation 30+ years
    • Thought Leadership Topics
    • Sponsored Content
      • The Role of a DWD Administrative Law Judge
  • Advertise
  • Subscriptions
    • New Subscriptions
    • Renewal Subscriptions
    • Change User Profile
  • New Laws
  • Indiana Lawyer Podcast
  • Diversity in Law 2024
  • Leadership in Law 2025
  • Indiana Court Vacancies
  • Year in Review
  • M&A Monthly
Home » Search

Search Results

7183 results for 'articles'

To refine your search through our archives use our Advanced Search

Justices uphold state’s voter ID law

July 6, 2010

Voters will still need to have valid photo identification to be able to vote in person in Indiana elections.

Could Indiana adopt a law like Arizona’s?

July 6, 2010

Immigration attorneys and victims advocates are reading up on the Arizona illegal immigrant law and bracing themselves for
what a similar bill in Indiana could mean for their clients.

Appellate court openings spark discussion about experience

July 6, 2010

Whether someone has worn a black robe before joining an appellate court is a discussion that often surfaces whenever one of
those judiciary posts opens in either the state or federal system.

Makeup BP

High court opening process wasn’t public 25 years ago

July 2, 2010

The nearly three-dozen attorneys who’ve applied to become the state’s newest justice sets a record for the past
25 years, but it falls short of the number who’d applied for an Indiana Supreme Court post a quarter century ago.

Opinions July 2, 2010 ILD

July 2, 2010

The following opinions were posted after IL deadline Thursday.

Indiana Supreme Court
Che
B. Carter v. State of Indiana
49S04-0903-PC-102
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post conviction relief. While the instruction that attempted murder required
a knowing step toward an intentional killing was substandard, it is apparent that the jury was told what the law required.

Today’s opinions
Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Clifton
Mauricio v. State of Indiana (NFP)

02A03-1002-PC-130
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.

C.M.M.
v. D.D.F. (NFP)

09A04-0910-CV-564
Civil. Affirms denial of father C.M.M.’s petition for hearing and modification of prior order based on actions of children.

Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Lawyer privately reprimanded for hiring inmate

July 2, 2010

The Indiana Supreme Court handed down a private reprimand to a Shelby County attorney who engaged in misconduct by hiring
a nonlawyer inmate to help research and prepare a post-conviction relief petition for another client.

Opinions July 2, 2010

July 2, 2010

Indiana Court of Appeals
Clifton
Mauricio v. State of Indiana (NFP)

02A03-1002-PC-130
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.

District judge asks court to answer certified question

July 2, 2010

The U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Indiana is asking the state’s Supreme Court to accept a certified
question in litigation involving the Indiana Products Liability Act.

High court names ICLEO participants

July 2, 2010

The Indiana Supreme Court has announced the 26 participants in this year’s Indiana Conference for Legal Education Opportunities
Summer Institute.

Police entry violated man’s constitutional rights

July 1, 2010

The entry by police into a man’s apartment based on uncorroborated information from an anonymous source violated the
man’s federal and state constitutional rights, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Wednesday. Because of this, the drugs
found in the man’s apartment must be suppressed.

Justices: no summary judgment for grocer in negligence suit

July 1, 2010

The Indiana Supreme Court upheld the denial of a supermarket’s motion for summary judgment in a negligence case, finding
the company failed to carry its burden in showing that criminal activity on its premises at the time a customer was assaulted
wasn’t foreseeable.

Opinions July 1, 2010 ILD

July 1, 2010

The following opinions were posted after IL deadline Wednesday
Indiana Supreme Court

Curtis
F. Sample v. State of Indiana
45S03-1006-CR-338
Criminal. Affirms Sample’s convictions and sentence for attempted murder and criminal confinement. Vacates habitual
finding adjudication and remands for new habitual offender phase of trial. Because the trial court provided over Sample’s
objection an instruction that minimized the jury’s power of discretion in making a determination on habitual offender
status, and provided a “law and facts” instruction that rendered meaningless the jury’s Article I, Section
19 authority, the trial court committed reversible error. Sample is entitled to have the habitual offender adjudication vacated.

Subhen
Ghosh v. Indiana State Ethics Commission and Office of the Inspector General
32S01-0910-CV-504
Civil. Holds that a 2005 amendment authorized State Employee Appeals Commission to consider ethical violations among other
grounds for termination in conducting this review, but did not otherwise affect the general rule that the Ethics Commission
has exclusive jurisdiction to interpret the state Ethics Code. Ghosh’s attempt to review his termination by the Indiana
Department of Environmental Management in this subsequent Ethics Commission proceeding is therefore barred by IDEM’s
earlier unappealed decision to terminate him. Upholds the Ethics Commission’s sanction against Ghosh.

Austin
Knight v. State of Indiana
02S03-1006-CR-339
Criminal. Revises Knight’s sentence of 70 years following a guilty plea without a plea agreement to 11 counts, including
felony burglary and robbery, to a total aggregate term of 40 years. Cannot conclude that Knight’s transgressions necessarily
“demonstrate a character of such recalcitrance or depravity” that they justify a 70-year sentence. Remands for
re-sentencing.

Today’s opinions
Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals
John
M. Knight v. Kelly A. Knight (NFP)
39A01-0909-CV-453
Civil. Affirms denial of John Knight’s petition for modification of child support.

Luiz
Alves v. Damon R.  Leichty, James W. Tuesley, and Barnes & Thornburg, LLC (NFP)
71A03-0912-CV-605
Civil. Affirms dismissal with prejudice of Alves’ complaint for legal malpractice.

Karla
J. Reaser v. State of Indiana (NFP)
92A03-1001-CR-20
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class C felony battery, Class A misdemeanor possession of paraphernalia, and Class D felony
criminal confinement.

Derrick
D. Hammond v. State of Indiana (NFP)
59A05-0908-CR-475
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class A misdemeanor operating while intoxicated and Class B misdemeanor false informing.



In Re: the Marriage of J.R. and M.R. (NFP)
30A01-0912-CV-581
Civil. Affirms child support award, reverses division of marital estate, and remands with instructions.

Elizabeth
Saldivar-Cruz v. Guardian Industries Corp. (NFP)
93A02-0909-EX-839
Civil. Affirms denial of application for adjustment of claim with the Worker’s Compensation Board of Indiana.

Gregory
A. Harpenau v. State of Indiana (NFP)
62A01-1002-CR-52
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class D felony operating a vehicle while intoxicated with a prior conviction.

Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Opinions July 1, 2010

July 1, 2010

Indiana Court of Appeals
Luiz
Alves v. Old National Bank f/k/a St. Joseph Capital Bank
71A03-0909-CV-416
Civil. Affirms denial of Alves’ Ind. Trial Rule 60(B) motion. Because he filed his motion more than one year after
the trial court granted summary judgment for Old National Bank and his earlier appeal of that judgment doesn’t toll
the 1-year limit applicable to motions brought pursuant to subsections (1)-(4), his motion is untimely. In addition, the evidence
on appeal doesn’t show the bank owed a duty to Alves or that the bank breached a duty by conspiring with his former
business partner to remove him from their company.

1-year limit toll not extended by appeal

July 1, 2010

The one-year limit to file a motion for relief from judgment under Indiana Trial Rule 60(B) is not from the time an appeals
court rules on the matter, but must be made within one year after the trial court enters its order, the Indiana Court of Appeals
ruled today in an issue of first impression.

34 apply to become next Indiana justice

July 1, 2010

There are a lot of people in Indiana who want to become the state’s next Supreme Court Justice. 

COA finds fundamental error in juvenile case, again

June 30, 2010

In a case identical to one it ruled on earlier this year, the Indiana Court of Appeals found the state violated a juvenile’s
right to counsel at her detention hearing.

Opinions June 30, 2010 ILD

June 30, 2010

The following opinion was posted after IL deadline Tuesday.
Indiana Supreme Court

Kenneth
Brown v. State of Indiana

11S04-0911-CR-537
Criminal. Affirms Brown’s convictions of possession with intent to deliver methamphetamine as a Class B felony, possession
of a controlled substance as a Class C felony, possession of paraphernalia as a Class A misdemeanor, and possession of marijuana
as a Class A misdemeanor. Brown failed to preserve his challenge to the admissibility of evidence. Holds that a claimed error
in admitting unlawfully seized evidence at trial is not preserved for appeal unless an objection was lodged at the time the
evidence was offered. Also holds that such a claim, without more, does not assert fundamental error.

Today’s opinions
Indiana Court of Appeals
Michael
L. Smith v. State of Indiana

52A04-0909-CR-504
Criminal. Affirms Smith’s 7-year sentence following guilty plea to auto theft, institutional criminal mischief, and
arson. Reverses condition of probation that says unfavorable results of Smith’s polygraph examinations on drug use and
drug trafficking would constitute a probation violation. The use of those tests is improper as found in Hoeppner. Remands
for trial court to amend Smith’s conditions of probation to say positive results may be used against him in a probation-revocation
proceedings and may constitute a violation of probation.

Brightpoint,
Inc. and Brightpoint Europe A/S v. Steen F. Pedersen

49A02-0912-CV-1196
Civil. Affirms dismissal of Brightpoint’s complaint against Pedersen. The trial court did not abuse its discretion
in denying Brightpoint and Brightpoint Europe’s motion to strike nor in dismissing the complaint on the basis of comity.

John
Bragg and Built on Foundation, Inc. v. City of Muncie and The Housing Authority

18A04-0912-CV-725
Civil. Affirms summary judgment in favor of City of Muncie and the Muncie Housing Authority on Bragg’s claim for tortious
interference with a contract. Thus, the designated evidence establishes that the agreement between Weatherly and Bragg may
very well have violated the requirements of Indiana Code Section 36-1-2-1 et seq., which would have rendered the contract
void ab initio.

John
Offett v. State of Indiana (NFP)

49A04-0912-CR-687
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony forgery.

C.B.
v. State of Indiana (NFP)

49A02-0909-JV-842
Juvenile. Affirms adjudication for committing dangerous possession of a firearm by a child, a Class A misdemeanor if committed
by an adult.

Eddie
D. Lowe v. State of Indiana (NFP)

58A01-0912-CR-615
Criminal. Affirms revocation of probation.

Michael
K. Williams v. State of Indiana (NFP)

45A03-0909-CR-438
Criminal. Affirms denial of motion to correct sentence.

Carmen
Kelleher, et al. v. Carol Mason, as personal representative of the Estate of Donald W. Mason (NFP)

45A03-0912-CV-598
Civil. Affirms declaratory judgment in favor of Donald Mason’s estate.

Patton
Homes, LLC, et al. v. Robert Bellows, et al. (NFP)

03A04-0906-CV-358
Civil. Reverses finding that Patton was bound by Robert Bellows’ contractual obligation to the City of Columbus to
provide the sidewalks in question.

Jermaine
J. Johnson v. State of Indiana (NFP)

49A04-0910-CR-591
Criminal. Reverses order Johnson pay $100 supplemental public defender service fee and remands.

Danny
T. Dunlap v. State of Indiana (NFP)

49A02-0907-PC-620
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.

Lawrence
Brown v. State of Indiana (NFP)

49A02-0908-CR-732
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A voluntary manslaughter.

Thaddeus
J. Zysk v. Jennifer K. Zysk (NFP)

48A02-0912-CV-1236
Civil. Affirms order granting Jennifer Zysk’s request to relocate to California with parties’ two minor children.

Jon
Marc Kaetzel and Beverly K. Kaetzel v. The Carl Kaetzel Trust, et al. (NFP)

74A01-1001-PL-30
Civil plenary. Reverses judgment against Jon and Beverly Kaetzel on the trusts’ breach of trust claim. Remands with
instructions to enter judgment in favor of Jon and Beverly Kaetzel on the claim and to rule on all remaining claims. Affirms
judgment for Carl Kaetzel on prejudgment interest and remands with instructions to calculate the amount owed.

Term.
of Parent-Child Rel. of J.G. & J.R.; A.R. v. IDCS (NFP)

20A05-1001-JT-21
Juvenile. Affirms termination of parental rights.

Richard
Joslyn v. State of Indiana (NFP)

49A04-0908-CR-460
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class C felony stalking and four counts of Class A misdemeanor invasion of privacy.

Guardianship
of Alice L. Schoonover (NFP)

84A01-0904-CV-207
Civil. Affirms order that Margaret Ditteon reimburse the Estate of Alice L. Schoonover for funds misappropriated by a woman
who preceded Ditteon as guardian.

Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
 

Booking card exception to hearsay rule

June 30, 2010

A booking card created by law enforcement in the course of a ministerial, nonevaluative booking process is not subject to
the police reports exclusion under Indiana Evidence Rule 803(8), the Indiana Court of Appeals decided today.

Opinions June 30, 2010

June 30, 2010

Indiana Supreme Court
League of Women Voters, et al. v. Todd Rokita

49S02-1001-CV-50
Civil. Affirms trial court dismissal of challenge to state’s voter identification law. The case presents only facial
constitutional challenges. It is within the power of the legislature to require voters to present photo ID at the polls. Justice
Boehm dissents.

Justices address economic loss rule in 2 opinions

June 30, 2010

In two separate rulings involving the “economic loss rule,” the Indiana Supreme Court ruled against a library
seeking to hold subcontractors and an engineer responsible for negligence, and in favor of a bank in its tort claim against
a title company.

« Previous 1 … 2,242 2,243 2,244 2,245 2,246 … 2,379 Next »

In This Issue

  • Some Rokita targets continue fighting civil subpoenas on immigration

  • State and federal courts leaning more heavily on magistrates

  • Legal troubles at Jack’s Donuts concern some local franchisees

Most Read
  • State’s high court to hear arguments on double jeopardy, right to appeal

  • Colleagues remember John Trimble as ‘pillar’ of Indiana’s legal community

  • List of new Indiana laws approved this year

  • 9 Indiana counties chosen for misdemeanor defense reimbursement pilot

  • Owner of Broad Ripple bar charged with underreporting more than $4.5M in sales

Back To Top
  • Submit to Edit
    • Submit People/Company Announcements
    • Correction to Story
    • Award Nominations
    • Letter to the Editor
    • Press Release
    • FTP to Indiana Lawyer
  • Events
    • Upcoming Lawyer Events
    • Event Sponsorship
    • Award Nominations
  • Support & Information
    • Customer Service
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Reprints
  • Advertising
    • IL Advertising
    • Contacts
    • Classifieds
  • Multimedia
    • Photo Galleries
    • Video Gallery
    • Mobile Phone App
    • Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
    • Indiana Lawyer on Twitter
    • Indiana Lawyer on LinkedIn
  • TheIndianaLawyer.com
    • Editorial Calendar
    • Archives
    • Indiana Lawyer Digital Newspaper
    • Supplements
  • Other IBJ Media Websites
    • IBJ.com
    • IBJ Store
    • Court & Commercial Record
Copyright © 2025 All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy | Terms of Use