David Dreyer: Is an avalanche of injunction requests on the way?
My traditional joy about injunctive relief may be facing a very practical challenge.
To refine your search through our archives use our Advanced Search
My traditional joy about injunctive relief may be facing a very practical challenge.
The state’s “stand your ground” law is currently being assessed in light of the shooting of a 32-year-old house cleaner who was killed while mistakenly trying to enter the wrong Whitestown home.
While the law’s stated purpose is to prevent fraudulent activity in Indiana, its most practical effects will be felt in how businesses list their addresses, use commercial mail services and handle required filing with the Indiana Secretary of State’s office.
See a preview of next week’s episode of The Indiana Lawyer Podcast.
Virtual hearings are commonly used in some cases, and if the Indiana Supreme Court accepts a recent administrative rule proposal, remote proceedings could be presumed in certain circumstances.
Recognizing AI as being “pattern based” rather than logic or fact based is central in determining which tasks may or may not be a good fit for AI.
One amendment includes the timing and method for complying with a rule that addresses claiming privilege or work-product protection.
We are in the middle of organizing our annual remembrance program for lawyers who passed on in 2025. Let us know of anyone who should be included.
An Employee Ownership Trust holds a portion of ownership of a company for the benefit of a defined purpose, not an individual beneficiary.
You make it possible for the foundation to advance justice and lead positive change in Indianapolis through philanthropy, education, and service.
The Indiana Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments next week for a case involving a longstanding dispute between a pair of former Munster school administrators and the state over alleged overpayments to the two men.
Chief Deputy Prosecutor Josh Kocher will assume Garrison’s duties to ensure a smooth transition, according to a Hamilton County post on Facebook.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Dennis Robinson, et al. v. Dana Nunley, et al.
25A-TR-189
Trust. Reveres the Jasper Circuit Court’s he trial court’s order interpreting an amendment to the Janet L. Robinson Revocable Living Trust Agreement to have the grandchildren share a $170,993.01 payment out of the residuary of the revocable trust prior to the final distribution of the residuary. Finds the trial court interpreted the first amendment to the revocable trust to reflect an intention by Robinson to do something other than what the language of the amendment states. Attorneys for appellants: Matthew Land, Katherine Piscione. Attorneys for appellees: Jackie Starbuck, Brian Karle.
The last official survey of the dividing line between Michiganders and Hoosiers was conducted in 1827, and wooden markers placed by federal surveyors at that time have largely rotted into the pastoral landscape.
The start of the 2026 legislative session comes after months of political pressure from the White House for GOP-controlled states to reconfigure maps to favor Republicans ahead of next year’s midterm elections.
The facilities often known as “crisis pregnancy centers” have been on the rise in the U.S., especially since the Supreme Court’s conservative majority overturned abortion as a nationwide right in 2022.
The White House said Monday that a Navy admiral acted “within his authority and the law” when he ordered a second, follow-up strike on an alleged drug boat in the Caribbean Sea in a September U.S. military operation that has come under bipartisan scrutiny.
Two insurance companies are suing an Indianapolis shopping center after the center attempted to recover remediation costs related to an Indiana Department of Environmental Management claim that identified the property owner as potentially responsible for environmental contamination.
The Nov. 19 indictment charged DeCarlos L. Smallwood, Robert Sanders, Kumar Bishop, Sanena Williams and DeCarlos C. Smallwood with various drug, money laundering and/or firearm offenses related to the distribution of methamphetamine over the course of 2025.
Indiana Court of Appeals
State of Indiana v. Mitchell Jay Bozarth
25A-CR-978
Criminal. Reverses the Wayne Superior Court’s granting of Mitchell Bozarth’s motion to dismiss his charges of dealing in a narcotic drug, a Level 2 felony, and operating a vehicle while intoxicated endangering a person, a Class A misdemeanor. Finds the dashcam video was not materially exculpatory and was at most potentially useful given that Bozarth admitted that the heroin belonged to him. Also finds that because the evidence was merely potentially useful, Bozarth was required to show bad faith on the part of the police in failing to preserve the video, there was no evidence of bad faith and the trial court abused its discretion in granting Bozarth’s motion to dismiss. Attorneys for appellant: Todd Rokita, Jesse Drum. Attorney for appellee: Peter Capofari.