An Indiana Court of Appeals panel admitted it erred in a prior post-conviction ruling, finding after rehearing that a man was entitled to a new trial because a clearly biased juror was seated in his child molesting trial.
The following 7th Circuit was posted after IL deadline Tuesday.
David Camm v. Stanley Faith
18-1440
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, New Albany Division. Judge Tanya Walton Pratt.
Civil. Affirms in part, reverses in part the Southern District Court’s entry of summary judgment on behalf of Robert Stites, Rodney Englert, Stanley Faith, and Sean Clemons in a damages suit brought by former state trooper David Camm. Finds Camm presented enough evidence to proceed to trial on the Fourth Amendment claim as it relates to the first probable-cause affidavit. Remands for trial accordingly. Also finds trial is warranted on the Brady claim against the same four defendants for suppression of Stites’ lack of qualifications and against Faith and Clemons for suppression of the facts surrounding their handling of the DNA profile on Charles Boney’s sweatshirt.
The Indiana Court of Appeals has affirmed that a settlement agreement between the buyers and sellers of Zionsville real estate was valid and enforceable, rejecting the seller’s arguments that a trial court erred by excluding emails between the parties’ attorneys.
Towns and cities in Indiana may not adopt a sewer connection fee structure that contains annual increases for new construction, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday in a development case closely watched by homebuilders and local governments.
Ex-Indiana State Police trooper David Camm, who was convicted then cleared of murdering his wife and young children in multiple trials, partially won an appeal for a new civil trial after the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in his favor on some of his claims for damages.
Indiana Supreme Court
In the Matter of Brent Welke
49S00-1707-DI-472
Discipline. Suspends attorney Brent Welke from the practice of law in Indiana for three years without automatic reinstatement. Finds Welke committed attorney misconduct by incompetently representing a client, improperly using a nonlawyer assistant and knowingly making false statements of material fact to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission. Justice Steven David dissents regarding the sanction without separate opinion, believing disbarment is warranted.
An Indianapolis attorney who hired a convicted killer to persuade a defendant accused of murder to ditch a public defender and retain him has been suspended for three years for incompetent client representation and lying to the disciplinary commission. A dissenting justice, however, would have disbarred the attorney.
A Rushville man’s sentence of more than 500 years in prison for sexually assaulting his two daughters over the course of their infancy, childhood and teen years was affirmed in large part Tuesday by the Indiana Court of Appeals.
A convicted child molester who was previously admonished for attempting to circumvent appellate procedures has again lost a case at the Indiana Court of Appeals, this time for legal malpractice allegations against his trial counsel.
A panel of the Indiana Court of Appeals heard arguments Monday between numerous Indiana charter schools and the state regarding several million dollars in unpaid tuition the schools say was not provided to cover costs for students.
The following Indiana Supreme Court decision was posted after IL deadline Friday.
Corey R. Faith v. State of Indiana
19S-CR-499
Criminal. Revises the sentencing order from an aggregate 70 years in prison to an executed sentence of 60 years in prison for Corey Faith’s conviction in Harrison Superior Court on three counts of Class A felony child molesting. Finds that under the circumstances of the case, the Court of Appeals’ reduction of Faith’s sentence to 30 years executed was wholly inadequate. Justice Geoffrey Slaughter dissents to the grant of transfer but would affirm the trial court.
Multiple child molestation charges against a father will stand, the Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed Monday, rejecting the man’s arguments that a video-recorded interview of the victim and statements she made to a therapist and nurse should not have been admitted into evidence.
Indiana Court of Appeals
James Witham v. Michael G. Steffan, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Gerald W. Rogers, et al.
18A-TR-2914
Trust. Reverses on interlocutory appeal the dismissal of Witham’s petition to contest a will. The trial court erred in dismissing Witham’s petition with prejudice as wrongfully filed, finding that the trial court instead should have transferred the matter to the appropriate court. Remands with instructions to transfer the case to Lake Superior Court for further proceedings.
Calling a trial court’s dismissal of a relative’s petition to contest a will “draconian,” the Indiana Court of Appeals on Friday reinstated the petition and sent the case back to Lake County to be heard in the superior rather than circuit court.
The Indiana Court of Appeals on Friday asked the Indiana General Assembly for guidance as it sharply divided over whether minor felonies reduced to misdemeanor convictions should trigger new five-year waiting periods for people seeking to expunge their criminal records. The majority ruled they should, a result the dissenting judge called “unjust and ill-advised.”
Indiana Court of Appeals
Corey Lamar Winters v. State of Indiana
19A-CR-431
Criminal. Affirms Corey Winters’ conviction in Marion Superior Court of Class C misdemeanor operating a vehicle with an alcohol concentration equivalent of .08 or more. Finds there is sufficient evidence to support his conviction.
A case that split the Indiana Supreme Court last December over a criminal defendant’s mental capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions dovetails into a larger question looming before the U.S. Supreme Court — whether states have to provide laws that allow for an insanity defense.
A man asleep behind the wheel of a parked but running car after a night of drinking couldn’t convince the Indiana Court of Appeals that there was insufficient evidence to prove he had been operating the vehicle.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Jaron Leekingdus Ratliff v. State of Indiana
18A-CR-2387
Criminal. Affirms the Delaware Circuit Court’s denial of Jaron Ratliff’s motion to discharge his two charges of Class A felony dealing in cocaine. Finds the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Ratliff’s motion to discharge pursuant to Indiana Criminal Rule 4(C). Finds the trial court’s decision did not violate Ratliff’s Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial.
Read Indiana appellate court decisions from the most recent reporting period.