Articles

Opinions Sept. 18, 2019

The following Indiana Tax Court opinion was posted after IL deadline Tuesday.
Rolls-Royce Corporation v. Marion County Assessor
19T-TA-23 and 19T-TA-24
Tax. Denies the Marion County Assessor’s second motion to dismiss Rolls-Royce’s appeal of the assessment of its real property for the 2012-2016 tax years. The assessor failed to prove that Rolls-Royce did not: state a claim upon which relief could be granted; comply with certain statutory prerequisites, or; exhaust its administrative remedies. Also declines Rolls-Royce’s request for attorney fees, finding the assessor’s second appeal was not duplicative.

Read More

After judge’s plea, JQC investigating shooting

Though he’s past the legal ramifications of an early-morning shooting in May, Clark Circuit Judge Andrew Adams must still face a judicial discipline action investigating the matter. His plea and the highly publicized nature of the shooting led the Indiana Judicial Qualifications Commission to take the rare step of publicly confirming its investigation of the incident.

Read More

Opinions Sept. 12, 2019

Indiana Court of Appeals
William Hedrick v. State of Indiana
18A-CR-01945
Criminal. Grants William Hedrick’s petition for rehearing to correct errors in the Indiana Court of Appeals’ original opinion. Reaffirms the original opinion in all other respects, holding the erroneous admission of the Drug Enforcement Administration agent’s deposition testimony was harmless.

Read More

Opinions Sept. 11, 2019

The following 7th Circuit was posted after IL deadline  Tuesday.
David Camm v. Stanley Faith
18-1440
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, New Albany Division. Judge Tanya Walton Pratt.
Civil. Affirms in part, reverses in part the Southern District Court’s entry of summary judgment on behalf of Robert Stites, Rodney Englert, Stanley Faith, and Sean Clemons in a damages suit brought by former state trooper David Camm. Finds Camm presented enough evidence to proceed to trial on the Fourth Amendment claim as it relates to the first probable-cause affidavit. Remands for trial accordingly. Also finds trial is warranted on the Brady claim against the same four defendants for suppression of Stites’ lack of qualifications and against Faith and Clemons for suppression of the facts surrounding their handling of the DNA profile on Charles Boney’s sweatshirt.

Read More