IndyBar Association and Foundation Welcome New Boards at Leadership Celebration and Installation Breakfast
See photos from the IndyBar Association and Foundation Leadership Celebration and Installation Breakfast, held March 3.
To refine your search through our archives use our Advanced Search
See photos from the IndyBar Association and Foundation Leadership Celebration and Installation Breakfast, held March 3.
Indianapolis criminal defense attorney Robert Hammerle gives us his take on “The Eyes of Tammy Faye” and his picks for the 2022 Oscars.
A 44-year-old federal law championed as a means of preserving Native American culture by preventing the removal of children from their homes and tribes is being challenged on constitutionality grounds — and the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear it.
Noncompete agreements generally are treated the same whether analyzed under state law or antitrust principles. However, limited instances exist in which antitrust laws may be more restrictive than state noncompete laws are. Businesses with high market shares in their geographic and product markets should take special caution to ensure their restrictive covenants do not unlawfully restrain competition.
Businesses routinely use noncompete agreements to protect their most valuable assets, including trade secrets. However, noncompete agreements are increasingly under attack at both the state and federal level. This two-part series will first explain recent developments restricting the use of noncompetes, then Part II will focus on how that increased scrutiny on noncompete agreements may impact trade secret protection.
Antisemitism is both the world’s oldest hatred and its most current news.
Being one of the nation’s top public law schools requires staff who work tirelessly behind the scenes, who care deeply about student success and who provide high-quality help. In Bloomington, we’re fortunate that we have the best, with long-serving staff who are truly exceptional.
Two upcoming IndyBar Foundation events are certain to keep you feeling young and socially connected.
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Ashaki Paschall and Gerald Ragland v. Tube Processing Corporation
21-1853
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson.
Civil. Affirms the Southern District Court’s conclusion that Ashaki Paschall and Gerald Ragland did not produce sufficient evidence from which a reasonable factfinder could conclude that they satisfied all the elements of their sexual harassment and racial discrimination claims brought against their former employer, Tube Processing Corporation.
Two former employees of a commercial and aerospace manufacturing company were unable to convince the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday that they were subjected to a hostile work environment based on sexual and racial comments directed at them by other workers.
Mooresville brick makers unhappy with their union are asking the National Labor Relations Board to override the decision of the regional director and allow them to take a decertification vote.
A man convicted of transporting and possessing child pornography could have his sentence reduced after a federal appeals court determined his saving of the images in a cloud-based folder didn’t amount to “distribution.”
More than 60 Frost Brown Todd LLC attorneys, paralegals and business professionals rallied together on March 1 to give back to their community after putting a pandemic-prompted pause on in-person community service events.
Holding the administrative law judge failed to “clearly and rationally” articulate the reason for her finding that an Indiana woman who could sit for no longer than 15 minutes at a time would be able to perform a sedentary job, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeal remanded the case to the Social Security Administration for another review.
Indiana’s unemployment rate continued to descend in January and hit a low that the state has not seen at least since America’s bicentennial.
Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita’s office spent at least $2,300 for his trip the U.S-Mexican border in January that included a stop at a Donald Trump rally along the way, state records show.
Indianapolis-based health insurer Anthem Inc. is suing a former executive, claiming he stole trade secrets, went to work for a direct competitor, and breached a contract involving restricted stock agreements.
Court of Appeals of Indiana
Nathan C. Albrecht v. State of Indiana
21A-CR-1560
Criminal. Affirms Nathan C. Albrecht’s 10 counts of Level 5 felony possession of child pornography and 21-year sentencing. Finds Dubois Circuit Court didn’t err in admitting evidence taken off a hard drive in Albrecht’s home. Concludes his convictions are supported by the evidence. Judge Terry A. Crone concurs in part and dissents in part in separate opinion.
A split Court of Appeals of Indiana has determined a trial court didn’t err when it sentenced a Dubois County man to 21 years in prison after finding thousands of videos depicting child pornography on a hard drive in his home.
The Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications and Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission have issued advisory opinions regarding statements targeted at opponents made by candidates running for judicial office and public statements made by lawyers regarding pending disputes, including on social media.